User talk:Dtahbaz/Islamic Republic of Iran and the IMF

1. The lead is clear and content fully reflects the information provided in each section. Also, the information in each section is not repeated in the other sections of the article. 2. Even though the structure is very clear and each paragraph brings up independent points, the usage of headings is not proper, refer to the appropriate section in the training modules to fix. The draft contains only one embedded Wikipedia link. 3. It seems that firs section of the article is not necessary as the Wikipedia already contains the page about IMF. 4. Overall, the article is written in a neutral tone, however, adjectives like "severely" could be substituted for something more neutral or even for a bare fact, so the reader can evaluate the extent by themself. 5. All of the citations are from the IMF website which leads to a single viewpoint representation of information. The addition of images will make the page look much better. 70.95.171.245 (talk) 05:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Antonhawk13

Peer Review: IR Iran and the IMF
First Section: There is a typo under what is IMF, the word lends in place of loans. Overall this section is very informative and helpful, but it is really wordy and possibly unnecessary. Wiki provides hyperlinks to other large concept pages in lieu of giving this type of detailed explanation. I would suggest giving a very, very brief and concise overview of the IMF, then moving into its relationship with IR Iran. In addition to this I think it would be great to provide a hyperlink for the IMF in the paragraph. The brevity will also help with the non-neutral narration that comes out at times. Its hard to be neutral but saying as little as possible that isn't direct information on the event is a good place to start.Muffin110 (talk) 02:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

History: It could be helpful to explain what the standby agreements are and what they were used for. Also why did they only use a partial amount with the second agreement?Muffin110 (talk) 02:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Present day: Information is great and relevant. Work on brevity just a bit more and this section will be even better. Condensing on run-on sentences specifically could be improved. Finally, explain the last statement on the blocking of its economic policies with a fact, source, or something that is impartial. Then move on to revising the sentence to be in neutral language as well. This will help the credibility of the statement.Muffin110 (talk) 02:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

IMF Conflict: This is a great section. I challenge you to expand with succinctness on the Articles of the Constitution you brought up, in terms of their practical effect. What do those things mean for Iran. The language was very good, I thought it was the most neutral of all the sections. Well done!Muffin110 (talk) 02:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Peer review
What is the IMF

This section is very good.

Kenzasabri (talk) 02:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Kenzasabri

History of Iran and the IMF

There should be more information on the socioeconomic and political background of Iran.

Kenzasabri (talk) 02:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Kenzasabri

Iran and the IMF Present Day

This section needs to be a bit more developed. More information should be added.

The IMF in Conflict with Iran

This section is also very good. It is very well referenced and provides a lot of data.

Kenzasabri (talk) 02:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Kenzasabri