User talk:Dtfcdev

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Oldelpaso 15:01, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Dorchester Town Football Club
Hi,

Again, welcome to wikipedia!

Clearly, you're a DTFC fan, and thus you'll be interested in improving it and related pages. I am an 'anon' (unregistered user), who has chosen not to maintain a wikipedia account (for reasons I am willing to discuss but won't bore you with now!). This means I am not, unfortunately, able to start new pages, e.g. Mark Morris (footballer) or The Avenue Stadium, or upload key images such as DTFC's crest. If you want to do any of that, great, if not, never mind.

Anyway, my current project is DTFC, and I'm basing it upon WikiProject Football/Clubs. If you co-operate, we can build a great article!

Thanks!

Anyanon

Copyright
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Matt Groves, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material.

This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.dorchestertownfootballclub.co.uk/match/players/groves.html. As a copyright violation, Matt Groves appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Matt Groves has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Matt Groves. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Matt Groves, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words.

Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

(PS: This also applies to other articles using material from this website.) --Whouk (talk) 15:46, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for confirming that it's your site. --Whouk (talk) 17:27, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * It's possible the Admin deleting the pages didn't read your message on the articles' talk pages, or alternatively may have deleted the pages for a different reason. I can't see who the Admin was to ask them though - contacting the deleting Admin would be my best suggestion otherwise.


 * However, rather than getting the articles undeleted and editing them, I'd suggest creating more encyclopedic articles: don't copy the tables directly from your website, but write paragraphs about the players, ensuring that they are from a neutral point of view (despite your support for the team) rather than bullet points in tables, and don't include the "question and answer" format of some of the information. See Michael Owen for an example of a well-structured article.


 * For reference, the undeletion policy is at Undeletion policy --Whouk (talk) 17:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * You could ask on RN's talk page to see if he'll undelete the pages. But it may be better to recreate them in a different format. --Whouk (talk) 18:30, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Blanking pages
I get the impression that you've blanked pages you started with the intention of replacing them with something better, but I wouldn't do that, personally. Blank pages look pretty silly and usually page-blankers are vandals (somebody might get the wrong idea about you). You might strip the article down to "X is a football (soccer) player for Dorchester Town F.C." until you finish a Wikipedia-style table or something, but I'd avoid the blank page thing. NickelShoe 05:23, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Deletion discussion
Hi there. I've nominated en masse the articles about Dorchester Town footballers that you have created, as I do not believe that, as non-league amateur players, they are notable enough for inclusion. Discussion and voting is taking place at Articles for deletion/Dorchester Town footballers, your input is welcome. Qwghlm 13:31, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Re: this edit you made:, I would appreciate it if, when I have made a mistake in a comment I have made on a talk page, you point it out in a separate comment that you sign yourself, rather than directly rewriting what I have said. Modifying the content of others' comments on Wikipedia is generally frowned upon. Though I am sure you made that change in good faith and in this case it was only a minor change, I would prefer to be publicly wrong than have my knowledge misrepresented or my opinions rewritten in any way. Please refrain from modifying others' comments without their permission in future. Thank you. Qwghlm 00:18, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion
Hi,

I'm a bit surprised that you haven't voted on the AfD for the articles you created (at Articles for deletion/Dorchester Town footballers). Just follow the link and click edit at the top-right. I hope the 'welcome' that you've had here doesn't put you off the project completely. Very short articles tend to be frowned on unless it's obvious that they'll be expanded later, so it might be better to expand the player articles to at least a decent paragraph if you create some more. I think merging them into the Current players section of the DTFC article would be best though - if any of the player descriptions get too long later you could always split them out when necessary. I've done this at F.C. United of Manchester and nobody has complained (yet - this is Wikipedia after all).

If there's anything I can help with, leave a message on my talk page.

CTOAGN (talk) 01:03, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:Avenuestad.jpg
We can't use with permission images. They have to be released under GFDL or creative commons (or PD) for us to use them.Geni 14:53, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bradshaw.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bradshaw.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 06:16, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject on non-league football
I've been thinking about creating a WikiProject for English non-league football, and am trying to find out if there's enough interest to make it worth doing. It would be useful to have somewhere for people who are interested in non-league football to have a place to discuss articles, and if there's enough interest we could get a monthly collaboration going with a view to getting non-league articles on the front page. It would be listed as a sub-project of WikiProject Football unless the members of that project objected strongly to it, and people would be able to join either or both (or neither) depending on what they were interested in. I thought you might be interested so I'd like to know if you are - if I get more than 3 or 4 positive replies I'll set it up. CTOAGN (talk) 12:46, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Hill.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hill.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 18:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Radcliffe.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Radcliffe.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 02:36, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Some Advice
Soon i am planning to take a photo to put on this site. What do i choose as the licence when i do this. I only ask as you have deleted one of my other photos. Many Thanks (Dtfcdev 19:48, 1 February 2006 (UTC))


 * If you're taking the photos yourself, then you should license it under an appropriate Creative Commons license, depending on what you want to require people who use the photo to do. See Image copyright tags for a list of CC licenses that Wikipedia allows.


 * As for the deleted photo, if you can give me the name of the picture, I can probably get it back. It might still be on Wikipedia, or I might have a copy on my hard drive. --Carnildo 08:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Non-league wikiproject
Hi,

I've created a project on non-league football at WikiProject Non-league football. There isn't much there yet, but please add your name if you're interested and feel free to add any content or put any suggestions on its talk page. CTOAGN (talk) 10:08, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Avenuestad.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Avenuestad.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peter O. (Talk) 18:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Logobig.jpg
Hello, Dtfcdev. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Logobig.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Dtfcdev. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 18:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Evesham.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Evesham.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 20:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Evesham.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Evesham.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 20:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Evesham.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Evesham.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logobig.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Logobig.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Dales Vale F.C.
Hello, Dtfcdev

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meena, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, New Dales Vale F.C., for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit Edit the page]
 * 2) Remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) Click the  button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And remember to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– Meena • 22:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)