User talk:Dts1234

Dolin Thomas & Solomon
This looks like a great start in turning the article into one that asserts notability. I have some suggestions for you in order to help you build your case much stronger:


 * 1) Consider using the following mechanism in the article for notes/references:  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. KenWalker | Talk 04:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Thomas & Solomon LLP for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas & Solomon LLP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thomas & Solomon LLP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)