User talk:DuaneCampbell1

The claims on the Cesar Chavez on violence toward undocumented immigration  are of limited merit. It did not happen that way. Chavez and Huerta spent years teaching citizenship classes and helping undocumented workers to become citizens. The UFW continues this today. Chavez did oppose the Bracero or Guest Worker program as it existed. The case you are referring to was when there was a strike and large numbers of undocumented were brought across the border to break the strike. The UFW and Chavez opposed the use of undocumented workers to break a strike. There is no evidence to support your claims of his advocating violence. You can find documents on this in The Fight in the Fields: Cesar Chavez and the Farmworkers Movement.(1997) by Susan Ferriss and Ricardo Sandoval. It was a cruel and difficult fight. But, to claim that Cesar Chavez opposed undocumented workers is simply false. It is a part of the organized campaign at present to expel the thousands of farmworkers presently harvesting the crops.

In these claims, the sources for items 4-6 & 7, are legitimate sources. However, they do not support the claim. They are simply historical sources and do not support the claims made here.

On April 10 these false claims have again been placed in the article. I checked with the source, I asked the author, and I looked at other sources. They are not substantiated. These insertions are a part of a political campaign by anti immigrant groups in the U.S. to create a myth.

Point of View The claims below about immigration have little evidence in support. Sources 4, 5, 6 and 7 are legitimate sources, but they do not support this claim. Source 8 talks about the issue, but makes no claim. -	The claim by Reed Irving in "Accuracy in the Media," is one of the major right wing sources in the U.S. - The one source that supports these claims is a direct quote from a column by Ruben Navarette. He makes the claims without offering evidence in support. -	The other source from the Orange County Register is the satirical column "Ask a Mexican." It is not to be used as historical evidence.

Joseph M. Schwartz
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Joseph M. Schwartz, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cla.temple.edu/politicalscience/faculty/joseph-m-schwartz/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 03:19, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph M. Schwartz
Hello DuaneCampbell1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Joseph M. Schwartz for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks,

I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 03:44, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

OK. I will re write and remove the copyright material. Duane Campbell

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 16:22, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ✉→ Arctic Kangaroo ←✎ 05:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello Duane, you seem to have some confusion as to what we're asking for in terms of "sourcing". An encyclopedia is a "tertiary source", that is we provide summaries/compilation of existing coverage of a topic. So what we need to see in Schwartz's case is not that he has written book X or Y (anyone can write a book), but that significant people/groups have discussed his books, career, impact, etc.


 * Oberve, for example, this GoogleBooks search which shows a number of books of political science, social history, etc that appear to mention this Schwartz. This is what you need. Any given claim about Schwartz's impact, accomplishments, etc. should ideally be backed up by a media article or book citation which backs up that fact. Ideally the works should be not personally/ideologically tied to him, so while it's fine to cite DSA as saying "he fills XYZ position at DSA", you shouldn't use DSA for more abstract things like "he had a huge impact on Legislation 235 in the Senate" (fictional example), because for that we want independent observers to make an unbiased observation.


 * Just a quick bit of advice off the cuff; does this help to clear up where our concerns lie? MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:42, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the thoughts. I will get back to you with a more detailed response.

Duane Campbell

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  78.26   (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 00:04, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

I continued to work on the submission. Per your feedback;

Thank you for the feedback. I do assume good intentions. I have resubmitted the entry as per recommendations as best I can understand them. Reliable sources. Your guidelines.

•	Material such as an article, book, monograph, or research paper that has been vetted by the scholarly community is regarded as reliable. If the material has been published in reputable peer-reviewed sources or by well-regarded academic presses, generally it has been vetted by one or more other scholars. •	Professor Schwartz’s two major books are published by two of the leading publishers in the field of political science : Princeton University Press, and Routledge press.

Your guidelines; One can confirm that discussion of the source has entered mainstream academic discourse by checking the scholarly citations it has received in citation indexes.

Professor Schwartz’ two books are discussed extensively and used in numerous references. I find over 80 references and citations. I recommend that you search for Joseph M.Schwartz, The Permanence of the Political. (1995). The second book,  The Future of Democratic Equality: Rebuilding Social Solidarity in a Fragmented America. (2009), is more recent and thus has fewer citations. However, there are significant number of citations.

I hope that this responds to your inquiry. I remain willing to provide additional documentation. I can submit to you pages with the citations lists from journals. Please explain how to submit. BTW. I have a doctorate in U.S. history. I have written and published 2 books. One went into 4 editions. With this experience, I find the instructions on referencing works very difficult. I tried the reference wizard.

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 22:21, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
78.26  (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 00:20, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

78.26  (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 20:28, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

78.26  (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 17:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

78.26  (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 14:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

I have re-written and sources the draft article on Joseph M. Schwartz using what I understand. The new page is at Articles for Creation/ Joseph M. Schwartz. One remaining question. I have used the source templates. The instructions from Wikipedia say to include the following at the end of the submission

Your submission at AfC Joseph M. Schwartz (July 31)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! QuantifiedElf (talk) 22:45, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Joseph M Schwartz was accepted
 Joseph M Schwartz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 20:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph M. Schwartz concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph M. Schwartz, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph M. Schwartz concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph M. Schwartz, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 5 February 2014 (UTC)