User talk:Dublindietrite12

Speedy deletion nomination of J David Cox
Hello Dublindietrite12,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged J David Cox for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Rberchie (talk) 19:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Alma L. Lee for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alma L. Lee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alma L. Lee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 01:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia
I noticed you're a new editor at the Articles for Deletion discussion on Alma Lee. I understand it's maddening to have an article you worked on put through the deletion process. That said, Wikipedia biographies have to meet a policy called the general notability guideline. For an article to meet this guideline, its subject absolutely must have coverage in independent, third-party sources. For a union official, union biographies and resources wouldn't count as independent, third-party sources. Similarly, a local politician's campaign website or a small-town hockey league's "About Us" page wouldn't count. That said, I would direct you to WP:WikiProject Organized labour, which may have some article-writing opportunities, or article improvement projects, available for you. I hope you stay around on Wikipedia, continue editing labor related articles, and ask me for help whenever you need it. Thanks, North of Eden (talk) 21:41, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Augusta Thomas


The article Augusta Thomas has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * the Washington Post interview is not a sufficient source for notability, and there is nothing else.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 02:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alma L. Lee
Hello, Dublindietrite12

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Clog Wolf, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Alma L. Lee, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 Clog Wolf  Howl 04:37, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alma L. Lee


A tag has been placed on Alma L. Lee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Alma L. Lee. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CiphriusKane (talk) 05:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)