User talk:Dubo Dubon Duponey

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mật sim (December 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mật sim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:M%E1%BA%ADt_sim Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WikiDan61&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:M%E1%BA%ADt_sim reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi WikiDan61,
 * Thanks a lot for your review.
 * Appreciate your comment on sources.
 * Though, my page has both more current sources and is more researched than the existing Vietnamese page: https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%E1%BA%ADt_sim
 * Can you clarify then why one should be rejected but not the other?
 * Thank you. Dubo Dubon Duponey (talk) 16:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * WikiDan61
 * Furthermore, your comment reads "lack of significant coverage in reliable sources".
 * The two sources I pointed out do have "significant coverage": they do indeed "address the topic directly and in detail".
 * Are you then suggesting they are not reliable sources? If so, can you clarify on what basis?
 * Thanks again. Dubo Dubon Duponey (talk) 16:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Both sources are either local travel or product sales websites, aiming to entice people to travel to Phu Quoc Island or purchase Myrtle Wine. As such, neither is considered a reliable source. Reliable sources consist of newspaper and magazine articles, as well as scholarly journals; websites where a reasonable level of editorial oversight might be expected. I suggest you read up on Wikipedia's definition of reliable sources for a better understanding. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:08, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * This is a traditional fermented drink that is little known outside of Vietnam (like Banyuls is little known outside of France, for eg).
 * Most, or all of the content about it is going to be travel guides documenting local stuff.
 * This seems to me that this is common place on Wikipedia for similar things (obviously because there is no other sources, which does not mean it is not "notable" (in the plain english sense of the word)).
 * For example, just a quick glance at
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banyuls_AOC
 * or
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuja_tea shows obvious references at marketing material from companies selling the stuff, individuals food blogs, sponsored / questionable food/health/lifestyle articles, etc.
 * I did read the page on "reliable source", and I fail to see how a magazine would be a more reliable source or be less incentivized in promoting content.
 * Furthermore, "a reasonable level of editorial oversight" is very subjective, and is obviously not a guarantee of accuracy, trustfulness, or lack of commercial incentive.
 * Anyhow, I am not suggesting to fight Wikipedia generic rules.
 * I am saying that common sense should apply depending on the topic and region.
 * Also, consistency is clearly an open question here: shouldn't we delete the Vietnamese page for Mat Sin? Or the Banyuls page, or the Yuja Tea page?
 * Thanks. Dubo Dubon Duponey (talk) 18:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mat sim
Hello, Dubo Dubon Duponey. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mat sim, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mật sim


Hello, Dubo Dubon Duponey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mật sim".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  00:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)