User talk:Ducati748

Just because Slovenia agrees with the call does not mean there wasn't universal criticism of the call. Slovenia is operating from a bias viewpoint. Everyone else in the world thinks he made a bad call or was perhaps taking money. Also, you should not add the word "some" to the article, because everyone thinks he made the wrong call. You justified this by saying that it is a US position, but that is not true. The whole world believes that except for slovenia.

January 2012
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Spoon, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you.  S ENATOR 2029  talk  14:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Jessica Jung, and others.
Please read Manual of Style/Biographies & Biographies of living persons and cease making constant changes to BLP's without discussing them first, and using edit summaries for communication. There is no conspiracy against Asians born in the US being called American, the simple fact is people like Jessica Jung are clearly notable for being Korean, there is no evidence to suggest she has American citizenship or considers herself exclusively American in the article as it stands. She lives in Korea, became notable in Korea, and works in Korea. There is a distinct lack of reason in Jessica Jung's article to suggest why she should even be called Korean American, but I have changed it to this simply because there is no evidence to suggest what she prefers to be known as or what citizenship she has. That is why I have requested sources to be found to clear up the matter of her nationality. One thing for sure, her Korean identity and justification for its inclusion in the lead section is not in doubt. Please familiarise yourself with the relevant guidelines. --Τασουλα (talk) 20:32, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Your personal opinions and wild accusations do not trump policy (but frankly, I don't care whether you think there is some conspiracy against Asian American's or not). And you have not come up with any sources to assert your claims whatsoever (i.e the passport part). The aggressive nature of your posts is also getting on my nerves. Can you calm it down? ^_^...and I never said she wasn't American, I'm saying there is a lack of evidence to suggest she is in accordance with policy... --Τασουλα (talk) 20:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Jessica Jung's Korean identity is clearly integral to her notability here. Stop your tedious, disruptive editing. I tried to be nice, but your refusal to communicate makes talking on friendly terms impossible. Go ahead and remove the Korean part if you want - if it so offends you, for whatever reason, I wont bother reverting again because I have no time for this. And kindly don't come into contact with me again; it will be treated as unwelcome. Sheesh. --Τασουλα (talk) 17:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Choo-Sin Sin-Shoo Choo-Shoo-Sin something or other...
I've moved the page back to what it originally was. If you object to that, you are more than welcome to request a move but moving it back again would be ill-advised, given that he is normally known as Shin-Soo Choo. Automatic Strikeout ( T  •  C) 03:30, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I have opened a move request here. Regards, Automatic Strikeout  ( T  •  C) 04:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Regarding your edit summary for one of your recent edits of Choo Shin-Soo, you are kindly asked to refrain from using "you" when possible, and direct your comments at the content of articles. Please comment on the article's talk page to build consensus on the article's name.  Cheers.—Bagumba (talk) 07:08, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

July 2013
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Shin-Soo Choo. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:37, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:43, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)