User talk:Duchovnik

Welcome and introduction
Hi, Duchovnik. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person by golly! And this real person (that would be me), wants to say welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad you've made an account! Thanks for joining; you're on your way to making some great contributions.

Because I've noticed you've just joined, I wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. Any questions are fine, nothing is too silly (we've heard them all). Now, the tips below - hop on them - they should help you begin editing. Best of luck! JoeSmack Talk 02:50, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

P.S. If you just feel like poking around, Help is a good place to start. :)

February 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jakew (talk) 10:28, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
 * 3) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Keratinization-glans.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Keratinization-glans.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 11:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Can you please clarify where you have this picture from, and whether you have reasons to believe it is freely licensed, right now. Because if it was uploaded in error, I want to clean it up as soon as possible, because such images are often used for vandalism elsewhere. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:06, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Got it here: www.oocities.com/stopric/leather.htm?20114   and it doesn't say anything about copyright.  If you want to delete it, that's fine I was just using it as an example on a discussion page.
 * Okay, thanks. Just for the future, please keep in mind that the lack of a copyright declaration has no relevance whatsoever: any image you find somewhere on the web is presumed copyrighted unless you have proof of the contrary, not the other way round. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:24, 4 February 2011 (UTC)