User talk:Duckie for broadway

Speedy deletion of Rory McCann
A tag has been placed on Rory McCann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Roleplayer (talk) 16:58, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been adding your signature to some of your article contributions. This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thanks for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Stifle (talk) 21:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It seems you are quite an excellent wikipedian! I apologise for putting my signature at the bottom of the page on Antonia Bernath, I am fairly new so therefore I don't have the wikipedian knowlege. sorry for causing you inconvenience! I really want to help wikipedians, like you helped me, but don't know where to start. I would love some advice!
 * --Duckie for broadway (talk) 07:02, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't be sorry, it's fine! Read Welcome, newcomers for more information for new users. Stifle (talk) 10:44, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Talk Page
Hi this is my talk page! Just give me a holler and i will reply.

Scotland
Hi

The ordering of the leaders at the Scotland article has been decided by a consensus of Wikipedia editors. Please do not change it without discussing it first. If you think the order should be different please explain why at Talk:Scotland and wait to see if a majority of editors agree with you. That is how Wikipedia works.

Thanks, and happy editing. DJ Clayworth (talk) 20:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message. As I said, if you believe that the ordering should be different for any reason you need to explain why at the Talk:Scotland page and wait to see if a majority of editors agree with you. If you have further messages for me you can write them here and I will see them. DJ Clayworth (talk) 20:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I see no problem with listing the First Minister above the Brown, in the Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales articles. PS- I'm not sure if there's a 'First Minister' for England however. If there's no 'First Minister' for England? there might be problems with subverting Brown in these articles. GoodDay (talk) 21:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello there, just thought I'd let you know there is a vote going on at the Scotland talk page concerning the discussion you began. --Jack forbes (talk) 14:17, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Of course you can, everyone has the right to vote. --Jack forbes (talk) 19:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Theatre
 Hello, and welcome to WikiProject Theatre! Thank you for adding your name to our project membership list! Our goal is to make Wikipedia the the finest, most comprehensive resource of theatre topics available online. As a project member, you might like to introduce yourself on our talk page and maybe add the project membership userbox to your user page.

If you haven't done so already, please add our main project page to your watchlist and browse our page of useful templates. When you have a moment, please take some time to review our article structure guidelines for theatre articles, which give a handy guide to sections you should try to include in articles about theatre. If you would like suggestions about where to start, we've gathered a few suggestions in the Project to do list and in our tasklist.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the project talk page or on my talk page. Again, welcome and happy editing! Addbot (talk) 13:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dramarama 2000
A tag has been placed on Dramarama 2000 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Chuunen Baka (talk) 10:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland
I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 15:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Antonia Bernath for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antonia Bernath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Antonia Bernath until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  12:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)