User talk:Duct tape

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glenn Edmond Shaw (March 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Femkemilene was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glenn Edmond Shaw and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Glenn Edmond Shaw, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Glenn_Edmond_Shaw Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Femkemilene&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Glenn_Edmond_Shaw reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Femke (talk) 20:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you Femke - I appreciate the constructive feedback and am revising the article now to be in accordance with wikipedia norms. This is the first of what I hope will be a series of biographical articles on climate scientists. There are too few of them known to the public, and I hope this will be a way to help make climate science more broadly relatable.
 * Best regards, Ray Duct tape (talk) 23:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Great work :). You may be interested in helping with WikiProject Women in Red/Climate. We have a gender bias on Wikipedia, and the project working to counter this has chosen climate as its overarching topic this year. The list contains names of people that are most likely eligible for a Wikipedia article. Femke (talk) 16:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glenn Edmond Shaw (April 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glenn Edmond Shaw and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Glenn Edmond Shaw, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Glenn_Edmond_Shaw Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Glenn_Edmond_Shaw reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 DGG ( talk ) 20:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glenn Edmond Shaw (June 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glenn Edmond Shaw and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Glenn Edmond Shaw, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Glenn_Edmond_Shaw Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gusfriend&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Glenn_Edmond_Shaw reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 05:24, 19 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Dear Gusfriend - I appreciate the review and the suggestions for improving the article. I have added references to five published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject: a PBS Learning Media video, an Associated Press and NBC News article, a section from the book Ages of Gaia by James Lovelock, a section from the book Aerosol-Cloud-Climate Interactions by Peter Hobbs, and a quote from the CLAW Hypothesis article by Robert Charlson et al. These define and document the important contributions made by G. E. Shaw. This definitely has strengthened the article, so thanks again.
 * This article has been through three reviews and I have thoroughly revised in response to all recommendations. I would very much appreciate a recommendation to publish so that this article can join the wikipedia mainstream. My goal is to continue to contribute biographies of scientists who have done important work on climate science, as part of the Climate Change WikiProject. Duct tape (talk) 19:06, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glenn Edmond Shaw has been accepted
 Glenn Edmond Shaw, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Glenn_Edmond_Shaw help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! ~Kvng (talk) 19:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)