User talk:Duduty96

April 2015
Hello, I'm Philip J Fry. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Elizabeth Gutiérrez because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Philip J Fry   Talk    17:28, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at El rostro de la venganza. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Philip J Fry   Talk    17:29, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Elizabeth Gutiérrez, you may be blocked from editing.  Philip J Fry   Talk    06:24, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at El rostro de la venganza.  Philip J Fry   Talk    06:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Elizabeth Gutiérrez shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 12:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Elizabeth Gutiérrez. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Elizabeth Gutiérrez
You seem to be removing the surname of Elizabeth Gutiérrez' character on both the article about herself and the article about the telenovela. Why? A source for that name had been provided, so it's not just idle speculation, and it seems relevant enough for a list of Gutiérrez' roles. Please explain your reasoning. Huon (talk) 21:42, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for restoring your version at Elizabeth Gutiérrez after expiration of block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Bbb23 (talk) 22:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Ximena Duque
It seriously?. Now why are you removing the names of the characters Ximena Duque?. There seem to want to reach any agreement, but still insist on the same.--  Philip J Fry   Talk    10:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Indefinite block
Your only purpose at Wikipedia seems to be to edit certain articles disruptively. You were blocked initially for edit warring at Elizabeth Gutiérrez. After expiration of that block, you returned and restored your version. I blocked you again for longer, and you did the same thing when you returned from the second block, although this time you also disruptively edited another article. In the short time you've edited here, you've never engaged in any discussion of your edits. You are clearly WP:NOTHERE to benefit the encyclopedia. I have therefore blocked you indefinitely. See WP:GAB on how to appeal this block.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)