User talk:Duffy2032

Hello. I noticed you've edited the page for Donald Berwick, CEO of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). We're trying to find someone willing to post a new entry on IHI itself. We have the content...would you be willing to post it? THANKS. Jjsmall (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2010 (UTC)jjsmall

Fair use rationale for File:TYTscreen.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TYTscreen.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:09, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2008 MLB All Star Game, AL Team
Template:2008 MLB All Star Game, AL Team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for deletion page. Thank you. KV5 ( Talk  •  Phils ) 19:14, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2009 MLB All Star Game, AL Team
Template:2009 MLB All Star Game, AL Team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for deletion page. Thank you. KV5 ( Talk  •  Phils ) 19:14, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 19:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:SenatorKirk.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SenatorKirk.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Rrius (talk) 05:17, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:SenRischOfficial.jpg
File:SenRischOfficial.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Jim Risch official portrait.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:11, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:JamesWiggins.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JamesWiggins.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:16, 23 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:16, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:JamesWiggins.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JamesWiggins.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 20:57, 23 November 2009 (UTC).

AFD
Hey there. You voted at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slovenia–Mexico relations But you didn't leave any comments, can you come back and add a rationale to your vote. Every comment is important. Thanks. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Image sizes
Is there a reason you put Congress images at 250px? The infoboxes have a natural imagte size of 225px that is assumed when no other parameter is forced. Hekerui (talk) 23:46, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It eliminates the white space around the images without really stretching out the box.--&#91;&#91;User: Duffy2032&#124;Duffy2032&#93;&#93; (talk) 01:15, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Better source request for File:LordWeatherill.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LordWeatherill.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:LordWeatherill.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:LordWeatherill.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:38, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

File:RoyJenkins.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:RoyJenkins.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:MarkSanfordOfficialPortrait.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MarkSanfordOfficialPortrait.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 23:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Template:Syracuse_Orange_basketball
First off, nice work on the template so far. I added Damone Brown and John Wallace (Geez, how could you forget Wallace??!) to the template. I think if you made the NBA you should definitely be included. I'm interested to see what your standard is for including someone on the 'Other Important Figures' list. A guy like LeRon Ellis or Marty Byrnes who made it to the NBA has had more of a lasting legacy than a guy like Eric Devendorf, who is floundering in the NBDL or a guy like Arinze Onuaku who probably won't make the NBA himself. Again, nice work so far. GoCuse44 (talk) 04:23, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Cuomopic.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Cuomopic.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Cuomopic.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Cuomopic.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 09:19, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

The honorable?
I moved this discussion for a wider viewpoint. Since several editors have expressed concerns, I would ask that you stop adding honorifics or other mass additions to infoboxes (I think you are the same IP editor that was adding detailed religious demoninations as well) until this matter can be sorted out. This applies to congressional as well as state official infoboxes. Thanks, and hopefully we can come to some sort of solution on this.DCmacnut &lt; &gt; 04:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have some thoughts on this, which I need to write up when I have a little more time. If I forget within the next couple of days, please remind me. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 02:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

55th United Kingdom Parliament
I like the information you included at 55th United Kingdom Parliament, but considering we have redirects such as 55th parliament of the UK → List of MPs elected in the United Kingdom general election, 2010 and the latter follows a fairly established format, I think the information you included would better be suited in existing articles. See Talk:55th United Kingdom Parliament. --Tim Parenti (talk) 06:23, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of United Kingdom Parliament of 2010
I have nominated United Kingdom Parliament of 2010, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/United Kingdom Parliament of 2010. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Alfred Robbens2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Alfred Robbens2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:28, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Clegg
You might think it is too tight IYO but it is better than what you have reverted to, which is an elongated picture of a long chest in a suit. Off2riorob (talk) 09:26, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, best to not get into an edit war.--&#91;&#91;User: Duffy2032&#124;Duffy2032&#93;&#93; (talk) 09:28, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * What? You want to edit war? Off2riorob (talk) 09:30, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I'm saying that I don't want an edit war.--&#91;&#91;User: Duffy2032&#124;Duffy2032&#93;&#93; (talk) 09:31, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Revert it back then, it is a lot easier to go, ow I think this long picture of a jacket and a tie is better and to press revert than to download and crop a picture on your computer and reupload it and add it to commons and add it to the article. Off2riorob (talk) 09:33, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I think that we're on different wavelinks here, I'm fine with your revert back to the cropped picture and have no interest in reverting it back to the long image again.--&#91;&#91;User: Duffy2032&#124;Duffy2032&#93;&#93; (talk) 09:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Rudd pic
Hi Duffy, I just wanted to congratulate you on the new cropped Rudd pic you uploaded. I had been looking around to find better ones but that one I don't think could be topped. Thanks and good work! GJGardner (talk) 10:08, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Hewitt picture
That picture of Patricia Hewitt, looks copyrighted to me, it is from here..what do you think all these are commons? library list is is unclear but they have this terms of use statement statement http://www2.lse.ac.uk/aboutThisWebsite/termsOfUse/Home.aspx#3 perhaps it is worth asking a picture expert, what do you think? Off2riorob (talk) 08:33, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Duffy, yes cool. I commented further on my talk and I left User:Toon05 a request to have a look for us, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 20:40, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, Duffy. Please see the comment from Toon as regards a lack of stability to the Hewitt pictures for commons. I would think removal from the BLP is in order and deletion request of the picture. Regards. Off2riorob (talk) 17:50, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

British Prime Ministers
Hi Duffy. Just wanted to say thanks for your contributions to the book. I'd forgotten about the other titles the PM holds while in office, but they're just as important in something like this. TheRetroGuy (talk) 11:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SirHumphrey.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:SirHumphrey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Template:2009SCCCSenate has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 01:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Ministry Navboxes
Hi Duffy. I notice from Neville Chamberlain's article that you have created many "X Ministry" templates. Well done. However, I do have a bone to pick — British Prime Ministers are never to be styled "Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain" etc. You should change the headers to something like "David Cameron's Ministry" "Ministry of David Cameron" or "Cameron Ministry". The fact that each named man was PM will be evident from the fact that he is listed as such within the template. Cheers DBD 11:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Clement Davies.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clement Davies.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 87.194.6.158 (talk) 22:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Clement Davies.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Clement Davies.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  05:22, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:The Sporting News Major League Baseball 2000s All Decade Team
A tag has been placed on Template:The Sporting News Major League Baseball 2000s All Decade Team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. Muboshgu (talk) 14:02, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for :commons:File:Ag brown.jpg
Thanks for uploading commons:File:Ag brown.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 09:20, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Issue resolved. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 12:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2009 New York Mayoral Election
Template:2009 New York Mayoral Election has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 20:15, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2010 Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipients
Template:2010 Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipients has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 21:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Cherylgillan-288x360.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cherylgillan-288x360.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Kelly hi! 22:45, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:ArneCarlson2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ArneCarlson2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:03, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Baron Carrickfergus
Please see the speedy deletion tag I left on the article. If you object, go ahead and remove it, but I think this move needs to performed fairly quickly, to avoid further confusion. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 08:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Clinton Impeachment
Template:Clinton Impeachment has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:40, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Lincoln Memorial section
We are currently attempting to bring the Lincoln article to FA status and are trying to establish consensus regarding images. Your consensus and opinion is needed on the Abraham Lincoln talk page. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 02:01, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:GibbsCrop.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:GibbsCrop.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion for WikiProject United States to support WikiProject US Presidents
Greetings, It was recently suggested that WikiProject US Presidents might be inactive or semiactive and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. I have started a discussion on the projects talk page soliciting the opinions of the members of the project if this project would be interested in being supported by WikiProject United States. Please feel free to comment on your opinions about this suggestion. --Kumioko (talk) 13:13, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:MichaelFoot1953.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MichaelFoot1953.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

July 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 00:32, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 15:04, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Lists of Russians
Per your comments here, would you care to comment at Bot_requests? Thank you. 198.175.175.57 (talk) 23:46, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * See Templates for discussion/Log/2011 November 14 198.102.153.2 (talk) 21:46, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

OGL
Hi, just a note to lets you know that those OGL pics such as the one you uploaded of G Osborne can go straight to commons where they are more accessible to multiple projects - thanks - Off2riorob (talk) 14:47, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Open gov. images
When you uploaded File:Justinegreeninghi.jpg, why did you not go to the Commons and tag File:Portrait-justinegreening.jpg for deletion as redundant? Why are you uploading images using OGL here rather than Commons? Commons:template:OGL exists and is in use. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 01:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Organization of American States Leaders
Template:Organization of American States Leaders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 07:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Mo Mowlam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Mackay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Deletion review for File:Cherylgillan-288x360.jpg
An editor has asked for a of File:Cherylgillan-288x360.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. &mdash;innotata 19:33, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Template: US Ambassadors to the PRC
I would like to draw your attention to a note left on this template's talk page, which you created. I had hoped to add the template to John Van Antwerp MacMurray, but stopped myself because he was not an ambassador to the PRC; he was an ambassador to the Republic of China, which bears both a different flag and a different name than what is used on the template. I would suggest changing the template name from PRC -> China, and perhaps also adding the flags of the Qing empire and the ROC (if possible). Any thoughts? Homunculus (duihua) 16:29, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:LordHowell.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:LordHowell.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Denniss (talk) 00:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Garter 2008 Charles.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Garter 2008 Charles.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 00:49, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Members of the House of Commons
Template:Members of the House of Commons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 23:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox United Kingdom Parliament
Template:Infobox United Kingdom Parliament has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Members of the House of Commons
Template:Members of the House of Commons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:LordGeorge-Brown2.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LordGeorge-Brown2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:ViscountMaugham.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ViscountMaugham.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Alfred Robbens2.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alfred Robbens2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:ThomasD&#39;AlesandroJrOfficial.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:ThomasD&. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Churchillwithsonandgrandsoncrop.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Churchillwithsonandgrandsoncrop.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:51, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

The Duke of Cambridge listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Duke of Cambridge. Since you had some involvement with the The Duke of Cambridge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nev&eacute;–selbert 17:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Grand Masters of the Order of the British Empire
Template:Grand Masters of the Order of the British Empire has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lords President of the Council
Template:Lords President of the Council has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Pres Clinton.jpg


The file File:Pres Clinton.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Stratton.jpg


The file File:Stratton.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:KevinDuffy.jpg


The file File:KevinDuffy.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kevin R. Duffy.jpg


The file File:Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kevin R. Duffy.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "orphaned image, low quality, significant number of better images of the subject"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Governor portrait hr.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Governor portrait hr.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 14:59, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SirArnoldRobinson.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SirArnoldRobinson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Full Brown Cabinet
Template:Full Brown Cabinet has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:55, 16 May 2022 (UTC)