User talk:Dugan Murphy

Welcome to Wikipedia
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * — M o e   ε  23:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Agenda
My friend, your edit history makes it seem that you are pushing an agenda with over-representation of John Neal. Please use discretion. For example, adding an image of Neal to an article about a book because he offered criticism of the book when the article has no other images makes the focal point Neal, rather than the book. --Midnightdreary (talk) 02:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I hear what you're saying and I appreciate you bringing it up. I just read what you linked about due and undue weight and I totally see how some of my edits, especially adding an image of John Neal (writer) in certain places, have added undue weight to his role in this or that article. I guess I was thinking that more images are better without considering best practices. I will be making more contributions in articles that overlap with Neal's life because that's what I've been reading about, but I will certainly think more about this principle as I do. --Dugan Murphy (talk) 02:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You may consider the value of adding even more information, rather than only info on Neal, as a possible solution. For example, I've done some work on The Spy (Cooper novel) where Neal is no longer the only content in that section. More to come too, I'm sure. --Midnightdreary (talk) 13:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of coupled cousins for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of coupled cousins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of coupled cousins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nihil novi (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know, Nihil novi! I just added my own comment to that discussion. --Dugan Murphy (talk) 15:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your thoughtful observations. I do hope something of interest can be salvaged from the "List of coupled cousins".
 * Best, Nihil novi (talk) 01:08, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

John Neal and references
I have started to review this for FAC and notice that you are experimenting with reference formats. I will post this here rather than at FAC because it is really your stylistic choice rather than something which FAC should be discussing. My suggestion would be to use without any of the further complications. There are several disadvantages to : --Mirokado (talk) 17:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * the need for named parameters for page or location makes the source even less clear
 * the source changes if the same reference appears either on its own or in a different order elsewhere in the article
 * is only 5 characters shorter than . I don't think it is worth the extra complication.
 * Thanks for the recommendation. I'm going to raise this idea in the FA review since there is an active discussion about there about uniformity in citations in the article. --Dugan Murphy (talk) 18:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

John Neal (writer) scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the John Neal (writer) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 20, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/January 20, 2021, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Good luck with what I presume will be your first TFA day! If you've never experienced it, I'd recommend staying off Wikipedia for the day, remember that several editors will be watching the page to keep it "safe", assume most people genuinely want to make positive improvements, and hope for the best upon your return. --Midnightdreary (talk) 19:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. That's helpful to hear. This is my first FA and my first TFA, as you suspect. I've been assuming that the attention paid to the article tomorrow would translate to a lot of edits. I can see how it could be better to let the dust settle before I assess what all those editors did.
 * What about watching Main Page/Errors, as Jim recommended (above)? You feel like there are plenty of people looking out to catch errors posted there that I can safely ignore it? --Dugan Murphy (talk) 19:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, yes, there should be plenty of people who will care for the page. All I can say is that it will be very stressful if you try to "keep up" in real time. And, in the end, the edits work themselves out over time; trying to pay attention to each one will push you into a realm of micromanagement... you'll want to learn to let go, and I say that in the kindest way! --Midnightdreary (talk) 21:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Good to know. I wasn't really sure yet what to do about watching the errors page, so I'll not worry about it. I really appreciate you reaching out with advice. --Dugan Murphy (talk) 22:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the article, introduced: "A child laborer cheating backwoods customers on the waterfront of a bustling New England city and later smuggling contraband blankets during the War of 1812 grew up to be a productive, athletic, outspoken, and quarrelsome lawyer with remarkable influence on 19th-century literature, art, and feminism. His is a truly unique story."! - I try watching over every TFA, but even more so over a "first"! Hoping you'll like the day, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2516 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks! I wasn't expecting this. --Dugan Murphy (talk) 21:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you today for Seventy-Six (novel), introduced: "Nobody knows who John Neal (writer) is, so everybody doubly doesn't know about his novel, Seventy-Six (1823), even though it pioneered literary styles that later came to characterize American literature and foreshadowed better-remembered novels by better-remembered authors later in the 19th century. So I think it's interesting anyway, and hopefully you do too."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:04, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * And thank you for the continued recognition! Dugan Murphy (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tobias Watkins
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tobias Watkins you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MEisSCAMMER -- MEisSCAMMER (talk) 23:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Great! I'll pull up the review and follow along there. Dugan Murphy (talk) 18:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tobias Watkins
The article Tobias Watkins you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tobias Watkins for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MEisSCAMMER -- MEisSCAMMER (talk) 23:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK
Hi Dugan! I reviewed your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Tobias Watkins. It's mostly good, with just a small bit of follow-up.

Also, I'm not sure which Dugan Murphy you are and want to step carefully in case you want to avoid being outed, but I think we may know each other off-wiki. I've been wanting to improve contra dance and related pages. Cheers, &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 19:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing my nomination! I must be the Dugan Murphy you think I am. Say hi when we start dancing again. Dugan Murphy (talk) 22:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Tobias Watkins
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know! I wasn't aware of the DYK statistics page. This DYK didn't break the threshold. I'll see about the next one I nominate! --Dugan Murphy (talk) 17:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hoffman's Course of Legal Study, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Hoffman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Articles by John Neal
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for John Neal bibliography
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Hoffman's Course of Legal Study
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Requesting some article expansion help
Greetings,

It seems you work a little on feminism related topic to an extent.

It is almost a year back or so we developed the article My body, my choice

My gut feeling is article has some more scope for expansion. From next March (22) or so I wish article goes for translation in some more languages. Pl do help expand the same if you find topic interested in.

Thanks & warm regards

Bookku (talk) 12:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, Bookku! I have done some work on articles related to feminism, but my research has been focused on the late 18th century through the mid 19th century, so I don't have anything to offer this article. Good luck with making improvements! Dugan Murphy (talk) 15:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)


 * 1) No issues, As such while working on My body, my choice I could get non western reference to suggest term 'My body, my choice' was used in 17/18 century west by slave owners to denote their ownership over slave bodies; but I could not get confirmatory western ref which I am still looking for. Secondly first 20th century usage by US feminist also is not clear enough. If by chance any time in future you come across then you may help out the article.
 * 2) I am also looking for some support for another "Draft:Sexual politics" if you happen to come across any material from range of your research then you might like to help in that too.
 * 2) I am also looking for some support for another "Draft:Sexual politics" if you happen to come across any material from range of your research then you might like to help in that too.


 * Thanks, it was very nice communicating with you, warm regards
 * Bookku (talk) 16:59, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I've never heard of any origins for "my body, my choice" beyond the 1960s/70s. I recommend being very critical of any sources that claim older origins and not putting too much energy into finding those sources since I feel they are unlikely to exist. These articles are also likely out of Megalibrarygirl's area of expertise, but she has worked on lots of articles about US women's suffrage history and may have something to contribute to these articles you mentioned. Dugan Murphy (talk) 18:49, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, No doubt already there has been substantial contribution from Megalibrarygirl to the article My body, my choice.
 * Progress of "Draft:Sexual politics" has been slow since my time and attention getting divided.
 * Thanks it's been nice communicating with you. Happy editing Bookku (talk) 03:54, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Yankee
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

FLC
Hi Dugan; just wanted to say congrats on getting John Neal bibliography to FL status! It's impressive how you've covered his life and work so thoroughly! &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 08:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the recognition! Next up at FLC is Articles by John Neal. I'm slowly working on an article now for one of his novels. Dugan Murphy (talk) 11:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Delphian Club
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Dugan Murphy. I'm just posting to let you know that John Neal bibliography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 1. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 01:22, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Looking forward to seeing it on the main page. Dugan Murphy (talk) 01:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Seventy-Six (novel)
 Schwede 66  12:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Delphian Club
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Delphian Club you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 23:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Promotion of Seventy-Six (novel)

 * Congrats! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for participating in the review! Now I'm interested in advancing the FLC for Articles by John Neal. Thanks for your participation in that as well. Dugan Murphy (talk) 13:36, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK video
Heads up, your video of Money Musk is live on the Main Page; congrats! &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 00:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The congrats is most definitely to you for getting Money Musk done. I'm happy to see that contra coverage has expanded. Dugan Murphy (talk) 00:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Delphian Club
The article Delphian Club you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Delphian Club for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 23:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Seventy-Six (novel) scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Seventy-Six (novel) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 2, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/January 2, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:36, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Yankee
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Yankee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:41, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Yankee
The article The Yankee you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Yankee for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Yankee
The article The Yankee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Yankee for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 20:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

John Neal
I'm not sure if I'll be able to contribute at your FAC for The Yankee, but looking through my sources for anything relevant I found an autobiographical sketch of Neal that I thought you might not have seen, since it's not mentioned in the article you wrote on him. It's in Duyckinck's Cyclopedia of American Literature, pp. 873-876. This link works for me, though I know Google Books links aren't very reliable, so it may not work for you; I thought you might be interested in taking a look. I say "autobiographical" since my source (Mott's History of American Magazines) says "undoubtedly written by himself", though it's anonymous. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for sending! This is a pretty good sketch and makes good use of quotes from Neal's autobiography and other works. The first version of Neal's article I started editing in 2005 was based on a biographical dictionary not too unlike this one, except that the terribly short entry left very much to be desired, which is why I started editing the article myself. If that 2005 version was based on Duyckinck's Cyclopaedia, it probably wouldn't have needed so much work. Dugan Murphy (talk) 17:24, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

My edits to The Yankee
I've been following Featured article candidates/The Yankee/archive1 as an exercise to learn more about the featured article process. Today, rather than make suggestions there, I've gone ahead and done some copy editing to the article. I know little about the rarefied world of featured articles, but thought I'd make the changes that made sense to me. Feel free to undo any or all as I may be mistaken. Keep up the very good work. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 04:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for going through the article and making some improvements. I really appreciate you taking the time. I manually undid a couple of the changes you made and stated why in the edit summary.


 * Featured article review is an opportunity for any Wikipedia user to review a nominated article to offer your opinion on whether or not it meets any or all of the Featured article criteria. If any changes need to be made in order for the article to meet the criteria, the reviewer lists out those desired changes and the nominator responds. Most reviewers leave comments mostly in regard to criterion 1a, and you'll notice others do image and citation reviews to check for compliance with criteria 1c, 2c, and 3. I would appreciate if you feel comfortable adding your own review, in which case you would be perfectly free to qualify whatever you say by stating that it is your first review or that you are only considering this or that criterion in your review. It all helps. For instance, if, after these edits have been made, you feel that The Yankee meets at least one of the criteria, you could say that you support the nomination based on that criteria. I hope you can! Dugan Murphy (talk) 22:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your note above and your clear edit summary at the article. I've been curious about the featured article process because I often read the featured article on the main page and so often see errors there. I am dyslexic and some kinds of errors are invisible to me, but others stand out.


 * I am unclear on MOS:RANGE and will ask for clarification at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (I'll ping you there). Also, I will review the criteria and make a note on the nomination page. Thank you, SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 23:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Thank you today for The Yankee, introduced: For only lasting two years, two centuries ago, under two different names, and for being published in what is today considered a small city and edited by what is today considered a largely unknown historic figure, The Yankee is a magazine that still comes up in histories of American art, literature, drama, and feminism. It's how Whittier, Poe, and Hawthorne got their start and how editor John Neal announced his prophetic cultural predictions."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of The Yankee

 * Congrats! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:22, 25 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Kavyansh.Singh! And thank you for pointing out the extra references. I removed some content and citations during the review process and forgot to remove those references that are no longer cited. Dugan Murphy (talk) 14:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Request for a review
Hello there, I am visiting with my begging bowl out. My latest FAC, Black Prince's chevauchée of 1356, has attracted only a single general review so far. I guess the topic is a bit niche. I was wondering if you might be able to look it over. If so I would be grateful. Obviously, if time or motivation do not allow I entirely understand. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure! I'll take a look. Dugan Murphy (talk) 22:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

TFL notification – March 2022
Hi, Dugan Murphy. I'm just posting to let you know that Articles by John Neal – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for March 14. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanking me for edits
Thank you for thanking my edit! SteelerFan1933 (talk) 18:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * And thanks for thanking me for thanking you! I often work in esoteric corners of history where few editors are interested in collaborating, so I really appreciate constructive contributions to those less-visited articles, especially the ones I authored myself like The Yankee. Keep it up! Dugan Murphy (talk) 18:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Rachel Dyer
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Speculative fiction
Hello. The reference is its author in Spanish Wikipedia @Ezarate. I just copied and pasted. Thank you.Allforrous (talk) 00:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Oshima Brothers
—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rachel Dyer
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rachel Dyer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 02:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rachel Dyer
The article Rachel Dyer you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rachel Dyer for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 20:21, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Have you considered proposing a Featured Topic?
Hi there, Seeing as you've now built up an arsenal of John Neal-related Featured Articles, Featured Lists, and Good Articles, I think it only makes sense to go for the prize: a featured topic on Neal. Have you considered this already? Thrakkx (talk) 18:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for bringing this up! I've looked into it briefly, but I feel like it's hard to say how many more articles are needed to make the topic reasonably comprehensive. For instance, he has many more books that I think are likely noteworthy enough to for their own articles, but don't have them yet. But I am proud of my little arsenal. Do you have experience in creating topics or nominating them for FT status? Dugan Murphy (talk) 19:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Nope, no experience. I am building (at a much slower pace than you) an arsenal of carillon-related FAs/FLs/GAs, and I also feel that I may need quite a lot to justify a FT. However, you may be able to go for it already if you can find a good fourth item. The Featured Topic on Lorde is quite simple – just her biography and three lists. Thrakkx (talk) 19:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Good point. I'll give the idea another think after I'm done with the FAC nomination for Rachel Dyer. Dugan Murphy (talk) 20:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Rachel Dyer

 * Congrats for another one in the John Neal column! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:43, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I appreciate you taking the time to review many of these articles. I've got to decide which one to write next! Dugan Murphy (talk) 11:42, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oshima Brothers
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Oshima Brothers you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 09:41, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oshima Brothers
The article Oshima Brothers you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Oshima Brothers for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 02:41, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Rachel Dyer scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Rachel Dyer article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 5, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/October 5, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  14:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you today for the article, introduced: "This is a novel by John Neal, considered by scholars to be his best. Nobody's ever heard of it, but it is the first bound novel about the Salem witch trials and had a clear impact on later works by Longfellow, Hawthorne, Whittier, and Whitman. If you have heard of it, that may be only because of the book's preface, which is somehow more famous than the novel itself. It deals with universal themes like justice, sexual frustration, and cultural pluralism."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the recognition! I'm excited to see this article get some extra attention today. Dugan Murphy (talk) 11:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Just FYI in case you didn't know...
...if you select two revisions using the radio buttons on the article history page and click "Compare selected revisions" you get a single diff spanning all the revisions, which you can then undo in the usual way with a single edit. This can save some effort dealing with multi-edit unhelpful changes. Thanks for all your work here (and congratulations on your recent TFA!) Wham2001 (talk) 08:16, 11 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the tip and for the recognition. I didn't realize I could undo multiple edits at once. Of course, your edit was the helpful one of the three, but only because it fixed technical issues posed by an earlier edit from someone else that added duplicative info to a citation and bolded a phrase that didn't need to be written in bold. I appreciate you noticing and taking action on that citation issue, though. Dugan Murphy (talk) 10:56, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Logan (novel)
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 26 January 2023 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for African Civilization Society
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you today for Logan (novel), introduced recently: "An 1822 novel of sex and violence on the colonial American frontier so incoherent "it is like the raving of a bedlamite" and so emotionally intense that "You are fagged and fretted to death, long and long before you foresee the termination." Yet studded with pearls of genius that meaningfully foreshadowed successors Poe, Whitman, and Hawthorne. Just read the plot summary ... if you dare, for it makes no. Damn. Sense. Awesome, right?" - right! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:16, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Hey, thanks! Nobody's ever offered me a barnstar before. I appreciate the recognition. Dugan Murphy (talk) 21:23, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Brother Jonathan (novel)
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

A solstice greeting
 ❄️Happy holidays!❄️

Hi Dugan! I'd like to wish you a splendid solstice season as we wrap up the year. Here is an artwork, made individually for you, to celebrate. Looking forward to contra collaborations in the future! Take care, and thanks for all you do to make Wikipedia better!Cheers, &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb }&#125;  talk

&#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 06:32, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Aww, thanks, Sdkb. Nice to hear from you! I hope you're well. Happy solstice. Dugan Murphy (talk) 14:29, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Brother Jonathan (novel) scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 3 February 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Today's featured article/February 3, 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/February 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 12:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you today for the article, introduced: "A gargantuan novel of 1,325 pages that required three separate volumes in publication, possibly bigger than any other well into the 20th century. A major financial loss for a shrewd Scottish businessman. A tragically lost opportunity for the author to *finally* overtake James Fenimore Cooper as America's top novelist. Brother Jonathan is a lot of things, but its not good, if only because it is just too many of those things at once: super realistic but also fantastically Gothic? Where John Neal's contemporaneous American readers took offense, British critics saw promise and modern scholars see sparkling gems far advanced for 1825, mired as they are in a thick and confused mess of a plot."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of African Civilization Society
The article African Civilization Society you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:African Civilization Society and Talk:African Civilization Society/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 17:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of African Civilization Society
The article African Civilization Society you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:African Civilization Society for comments about the article, and Talk:African Civilization Society/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 06:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Fredy Clue
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Bäckadräkten
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Promotion of Bäckadräkten

 * I read it a few days ago; fine work indeed! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Nice to hear from you, Kavyansh.Singh! Thank you. Given my otherwise exclusive experience with history topics, I'm excited to have a modern topic on the FA list now. Dugan Murphy (talk) 13:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Bäckadräkten scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 28 August 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Today's featured article/August 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 14:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Benjamin Jackson (sailor)
&spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:02, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Following the MOS
Hello. I notice you removed the convert template for Benjamin Jackson (sailor), contrary to the Manual of style. Wikipedia's aim is educating readers worldwide, the Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Units of measurement, states: that except for the USA and the UK, "the primary units chosen will be SI units", with a convert template, so no matter where you live, the reader will understand the unit. I'll add the convert template again to the article. Best regards, Avi8tor (talk) 05:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for bringing this up! I'm going to move this to the article's talk page, however. Dugan Murphy (talk) 14:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)