User talk:DuggyJay

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael A Peel
Hello DuggyJay,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Michael A Peel for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

O Lunala!  Imperatrix noctem.  20:34, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael A Peel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael A Peel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michael A Peel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * "I'm puzzled and disappointed that this page has been removed. Please get back to me with an explanation." --well, the explanation is that a. the article reads like a resume; b. it provides no indication that this person is somehow important (having graduated, having a job in HR doesn't mean one is important, though folks in HR tend to feel differently); c. there are no secondary sources that describe how this person would be important, let alone notable by our standards (see WP:GNG). Sorry, Drmies (talk) 18:40, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael A Peel


A tag has been placed on Michael A Peel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Drmies (talk) 18:40, 3 July 2017 (UTC)