User talk:Duke9282

March 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to The Great Global Warming Swindle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Scarian Call me Pat 23:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Not a forum
Greetings, Duke9282. Wikipedia is not a forum, and formatting contributions as a debate will only result in confused articles and the deletion of your contributions. Justin Eiler (talk) 23:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ditto for your entirely inappropriate 20:42, 23 March 2008 edit of The Great Global Warming Swindle. I suggest you read through all the Wikipedia guidelines before you attempt to do further editing of articles. -- Jmc (talk) 21:36, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It seems that you're continuing to make these edits. While your contributions are welcome, you have to understand that writing paragraphs of exposition about what is basically your opinion violates Wikipedia's policies of no original research and attribution.  You need to find reliable sources that make the points you want to make and cite them accordingly.  If you're unsure of something, feel free to post it on the given article's talk page and editors will help you figure out what's appropriate.  For the record, I'm far from a "defender of the global warming status quo"-type editor like the ones you criticize in your attempted contributions (ask any of the regular GW editors, some of whom would call me a quack skeptic).  But that doesn't change the fact that the Wikipedia rules apply to all contributions.  If you want to add something that's critical to GW theory and it's well sourced, you should feel free to add it. Thanks, Oren0 (talk) 19:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)