User talk:DukeWellington

November 2013
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on José Piñera, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. It has been established that Pinochet's government (whatever you call it) was a dictatorship; in contrast to Allende's government, who was democratically elected. Küñall (talk) 17:50, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Colegio de la Preciosa Sangre de Pichilemu, you may be blocked from editing. Küñall (talk) 16:55, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on José Piñera, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. Küñall (talk) 16:56, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

July 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at José Piñera. ''The use of "dictatorship" to refer to Pinochet's government has been settled that way, and, as a matter of fact, Wikipedia's article on that obscure Chilean history episode is named "Military dictatorship of Chile (1973-90)". Please don't revert it to simply "government", because consensus has chosen to use "dictatorship" instead.'' Diego Grez (talk) 22:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

By the way, I don't give a cent about what has Piñera done, but it's been agreed by consensus that we are to refer Pinochet's regime as a dictatorship. You are promoting here your point of view, and that is not acceptable. Especially since you've been doing this ever since you created this account. Please refrain from making any more controversial edits. Diego Grez (talk) 22:41, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Edit War
Your recent editing history at José Piñera shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Turgan Talk 22:46, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at José Piñera. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ron h jones (Talk) 00:46, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Diego Grez (talk) 15:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Socking
Per the evidence provided at Sockpuppet investigations/DukeWellington, I have blocked your other account. Please note that Wikipedia prohibits the use of more than one account with few exceptions. Please stick to only this account. Any further socking will be met with blocks. Best, Tiptoety  talk 23:48, 12 July 2014 (UTC)