User talk:Dukeconte~enwiki

Neuropsychophysiology
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Neuropsychophysiology, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.neuropsychophysiology.org/ISN_NPF_eng.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:07, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

From Talk:Neuropsychophysiology
Hello Pals, My name is Mirko and I live in Rome. This is my first wiki article, and I wanted to publish the work of prof. Michele Trimarchi, I cooperate with. The text is under copyright of prof, and is already published on his site, which I take care of, www.neuropsychophisiology.org. The question is: I am the person who works on the computer for him and prof is the author and copyright holder of all texts, so, is this a problem if he wants his work to be shared by everybody on wikipedia? Simply: the publisher of this article and the copyright holder are the same person. Repeat this is my first article and maybe i can't move very good yet. Is it a problem if the text is exactly the same? Should I put just simple external links? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dukeconte (talk • contribs)
 * Hello there, thanks for contributing. Unfortunately, the problems stem from more than just copyright issues. The concept, as written in the article, seems very much like original research, which Wikipedia does not accept. Note that I am not any kind of scientist; however, I would be happy to review any reliable, independent sources that you can find to verify this topic, and we'll work on getting the article reinstated. Glass  Cobra  14:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Neuropsychophisiology
A tag has been placed on Neuropsychophisiology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Neuropsychophisiology and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bearian (talk) 15:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

URGENT NOTICE
Hi, Mirko, I think that it is urgent to adjust the pages you submitted to the free encyclopedia. The attempt to cover the naif page of Neuropsychophysiology with a scientific aura arises our smile. Science is based on other criteria, maybe you know? And Wikipedia calls for the respect of other standards. Your pages (Neuropsychophysiology and Michele Trimarchi) do not share our Neutral point of view: maybe you are only trying to let them gain visibility, after their exclusion from it.wikipedia as a consequence of a severe public discussion, do you remember? Please, fulfill the criteria requested or your silence will confirm that your attempt is blabant advertising, only. Thank you. Julien Sorel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.104.231.188 (talk) 08:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michele Trimarchi
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Michele Trimarchi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable person, completely lacking any reliable sources independent of the subject, consists essentially of Spam

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bearian (talk) 15:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Neuropsychophysiology
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Neuropsychophysiology, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable school of psychology, essentially a coatrack for Michele Trimarchi, a Non-notable person, completely lacking any reliable sources independent of the subject, consists essentially of Spam

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bearian (talk) 18:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Dukeconte. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Dukeconte~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 12:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)