User talk:Dumenpro

Your submission at Articles for creation: BUUNT (July 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Urban Versis 32 were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BUUNT and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:BUUNT Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Urban_Versis_32&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:BUUNT reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk / contribs) 19:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, Versis32!
 * I am not experienced enough, so I kindly ask for your advice what exactly would be correct to remove or to add. I tried to write as much as possible adhering to the style of Wikipedia. Dumenpro (talk) 20:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BUUNT (July 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Urban Versis 32 were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BUUNT and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:BUUNT Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Urban_Versis_32&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:BUUNT reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk / contribs) 20:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:BUUNT


A tag has been placed on Draft:BUUNT, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk / contribs) 21:02, 24 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I see that at Draft talk:BUUNT you said that the draft was not unambiguously promotional. I can only wonder what you would consider to be unambiguously promotional in that case. The whole page, from start to finish, was a glowing accolade of its subject, written in the ludicrously gushing prose characteristic of the writings of marketing and advertising professionals. I don't think I could write anything more unambiguously promotional in tone and character if I tried. JBW (talk) 21:18, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Please look again, I have already made several corrections removing words about uniqueness and other epithets. Jewelry production cannot be described without adjectives, it is an integral part of creativity. I read many similar articles on Wikipedia about jewelry brands and tried to write as similar as possible to them. Please specify errors in the text and I'll fix them. Dumenpro (talk) 21:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Please read other stuff exists. That other similar articles exist does not mean that they are acceptable and good to use as a model. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to get by us. We can only address what we know about. If you want to use other articles as a model, use those classified as good articles. If you want to help us out, feel free to identify these other articles you have seen for possible action.
 * Your draft is not salvageable. Any article about this company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company. You used one source that was a sponsored post, meaning it was paid for by the company, that is not an independent source. The sources you use must be wholly unconnected with the company. This includes sources that are interviews with company personnel. Please read Your First Article. If there are no other sources, or only promotional pieces, the company would not merit an article at this time. 331dot (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Paid editing
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Dumenpro, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 21:52, 24 July 2022 (UTC)


 * It's not payed at all. I try to cut the article as much as possible. Maybe it can work. Dumenpro (talk) 21:59, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Do you have a connection to the company? You didn't pick it at random to edit about. 331dot (talk) 22:00, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I created this article because I'm trying to help my ukrainian friends to get on Wikipedia Dumenpro (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Please read conflict of interest. Wikipedia is not a database of companies where existence merits inclusion, the company must be notable as I described above. Feel free to show these messages to your friends. 331dot (talk) 22:11, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for quick reply. I'm here first time, so no any experience. I read more and come back trying to publish it. Or maybe it's easier to create it on behalf of the owner of the company? Dumenpro (talk) 22:17, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I personally don't think the company is notable as Wikipedia defines it and it does not merit an article at this time. That doesn't mean forever, just not now. It's harder to create an article with a conflict of interest, not easier. 331dot (talk) 22:46, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * See also Golden rule for an overview of what is required before a company can have an article on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:40, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Dumenpro (talk) 22:34, 25 July 2022 (UTC)