User talk:Duncan23111992

MV Yorkshire Belle (1947)
Hi. Thanks for your edit to MV Yorkshire Belle (1947). However, your edit is original research which contravenes WP:OR, so if you cannot find a reliable reference, your edit will have to be reverted. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 06:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks like I was beaten to it by The joy of all things, as I came here to ask for you to supply some published sources for the information you have given in the article. Thanks. Keith D (talk) 13:35, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Duncan; the article is great, however, one of Wikipedia's big policies is for reliable references. I had spent quite a lot of time putting in seven references when there were none. You have taken them out without stating why you deleted them. You must not remove references without good reason, they are there to back up the validity of any claims. As I am involved, I will defer this decision to as he is the admin for all things Yorkshire. Please do not be disheartened, but you have unwittingly undone all of my hard work and left the article largely unreferenced. I assume good faith on your part and of not knowing some of the salient guidelines in this matter. See WP:CITE, WP:NPOV & WP:VERIFY Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 18:29, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I will give a couple of days before reverting to allow some time to supply the references and avoid editing for the necessary formatting changes so as to make it a clean revert if required. It would be good to use some of the removed references. I would add that the references need to be WP:INLINE, WP:Reliable and WP:Third-party sources i.e. not associated with the subject. You do not need to struggle with the formatting as that can picked up later just so long as it is obvious what is meant. Keith D (talk) 19:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I have move your changes to Talk:MV Yorkshire Belle (1947)/Temp and restored previous version of the article. Keith D (talk) 22:30, 1 May 2017 (UTC)