User talk:DuncanHill/Archives/2011/July

Possible cleanup
Hi. By invoking IAR in the spirit of RBI, I was thinking of tidying Wheal Vor. Trust you wouldn't object. —S MALL JIM   10:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)


 * TBH I'm not keen on that. Hiding evidence of disruptive behaviour doesn't help non-admins understand what's been going on. DuncanHill (talk) 10:44, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * OK. Perhaps I'll add some more content to the article so there's something interesting in the history :) —S MALL  JIM   10:59, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Just a little side note...
Hey there, I wanted to note on the article that you have requested for protection (or semi-protection). Though not an administrator yet, I have looked extensively into that article and the patterns that I am noticing is similar to those of the other articles that I am also watching (those are not disclosed due to privacy), which also have similar patterns. Those do have a similar pattern in terms of adding by IP users that has been reverted by autoconfirmed users. I did not want to disclose how long the article should be protected due to recommendations given by my other users. If the article is semi-protected or protected, I will continue to monitor the article after the protection expires (when time permits), which I hope that article will not be vandalized again. CHAK 001 (Improvements? Please let me know!) 10:41, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Yet again
I think you may wish to contribute here. Moonraker (talk) 08:22, 27 July 2011 (UTC)