User talk:Duncharris/CASC

I agree with the general idea here; see User:ESkog/Schools for my views on school articles. I think that this would be better framed without inflammatory language (like the CaFUcK acronym) as this debate is already quite contentious already. I think this would also benefit from some attempt to clarify what is required for notability to be met.

It is important that something of this sort get organized, because the other side of the debate is very organized indeed, and I don't know that the current landscape of VFD is properly reflecting the general views of Wikipedia. However, we should also be aware that we may simply be in the minority. While you and I don't agree that these articles belong here, if it's truly the consensus of the community that these articles serve a purpose then we should keep doing as we do now - vote "Delete" within a minority who clearly expresses our views. ESkog 07:04, 9 August 2005 (UTC)