User talk:Duneschilde77

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. --Mhking (talk) 02:39, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Miller Beach Arts and Creative District


A tag has been placed on Miller Beach Arts and Creative District, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Miller Beach Arts and Creative District
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Miller Beach Arts and Creative District, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:12, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Miller Beach Arts and Creative District. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the article's . Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:18, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Miller Beach Arts and Creative District


A tag has been placed on Miller Beach Arts and Creative District, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 16:36, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Miller Beach Arts and Creative District for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miller Beach Arts and Creative District is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Miller Beach Arts and Creative District until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 17:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Miller Beach Arts and Creative District


A tag has been placed on Miller Beach Arts and Creative District, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 02:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Miller Beach Arts and Creative District
Please do not recreate this article with the same content. The article was deleted via consensus of multiple independent Wikipedia editors and cannot be re-created with the same content. You are welcome to recreate the article with improved content, by adding reliable source references that establish that the subject meets Wikipedia's notability criteria for inclusion. The main problems with the article were that 1) only one of the reliable sources on the article was actually about the entity in question; the rest only mentioned it in passing in the context of something else, and 2) while mentioning that other arts districts have articles on Wikipedia is great, those all need to have references to establish that they meet the notability criteria on their own; no article meets notability criteria simply by being associated with people or entities that do. As I mentioned in the deletion discussion, which you never contributed to, much of the content might be useful for the Miller Beach article.

Also, please note that adding content against consensus is vandalism and you may be blocked if you continue to do so. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 14:08, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Miller Beach
I have laid out my arguments here: Talk:Miller_Beach, and would appreciate your input. Cheers, -- Visviva (talk) 19:53, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Miller/Aetna/Miller Beach boundaries
Hi,

Since I'm still working on the draft (and probably will be for some time yet), I've taken the liberty of reverting this edit in my userspace for now. However, I think you're probably correct that there is a violation of WP:WEIGHT in the current structure of the section.

Still, I think the question of boundaries and variant uses needs to be addressed, particularly since the intended readership is global and cannot be expected to know anything in particular about the area. And per the principle of verifiability, the issue cannot be addressed on Wikipedia without reference to reliable sources. At the moment, the only such sources that directly address Miller's boundaries are the documents put out by the City of Gary.

While I can say that the boundaries of Miller as defined by the city are substantially at odds with how I and the Post-Tribune have understood them, we really do need to have something more than anecdotes and original research to go on. If you have published sources that specifically address the boundaries of Miller, I'd be very interested. (I did just notice this, which adds a whole new wrinkle.) -- Visviva (talk) 01:17, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Millie the Miller Beach monster
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Millie the Miller Beach monster, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://millerbeachmonster.webs.com/about-us.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 16:35, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Millie the Miller Beach monster
Hello Duneschilde77,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Millie the Miller Beach monster for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks,  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:42, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Miller Beach without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, I'm John from Idegon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Miller Beach, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 14:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)