User talk:Durikum18

Your edits
Hello! Please preview your edits before saving changes - your last edits to Thalaivankottai have been breaking the infobox, and one of the images that you attempted to add doesn't seem to exist. PohranicniStraze (talk) 12:12, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Create. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PohranicniStraze (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion notifications
This is to inform you that I've placed speedy deletion templates on two pages you've created, Category:Hindu Temple In Thalaivankottai and Category:Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai. It appears you are trying to write articles, but are creating them in the Category namespace in error. If you would like to dispute the speedy deletion, you may do so by using the "Contest this speedy deletion" button on the pages, but do not remove the speedy deletion notice from pages you created. Both pages are very unclear; I would recommend that you go through the articles for creation process to get feedback on any articles before publishing them. PohranicniStraze (talk) 00:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Contents/Technology and applied sciences, you may be blocked from editing. PohranicniStraze (talk) 04:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thalaivankottai. ◢    Ganbaruby!    (remember to ping!) 15:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Inappropriate removal of speedy deletion tags. Per a complaint at WP:AIV. Please seek advice from experienced editors. If you continue on your present course, you may be permanently blocked from Wikipedia. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:23, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai
Hello, Durikum18,

Thank you for creating Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (talk) 02:01, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai moved to draftspace
An article you created, Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai, is to hard to understand and read to remain published. The text needs to be improved. For example there are many words that start with capital letters. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article has been improved and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jonteemil (talk) 15:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Durikum18


A tag has been placed on User:Durikum18 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Username6892 19:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Hindu temples in thalaivankottai moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hindu temples in thalaivankottai, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

The only cited source is not a usable source, and it doesn't verify any of the information in the article. Remember to only summarize what quality sources have said, and to cite them in your text.

– Thjarkur (talk) 22:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Username6892 01:57, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 3 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 06:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Putrukovil Festival Thalaivankottai moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Putrukovil Festival Thalaivankottai, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jonteemil (talk) 10:46, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Jonteemil (talk) 22:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
{{unblock request| 1=Kindly Unblock Me I Don’t Know Kashkumar16 Account Password Unblock &#9765902;&#9765900|

{{unblock request reason| =I Don’t Know Kashkumar16 Account Password Kindly Unblock My Account &#9765902;&#9765900|

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I Don’t Know Kashkumar16 Account Password Kindly Unblock &#9767352;&#9765900 | decline = No. Yamla (talk) 16:34, 26 April 2020 (UTC)}}

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=block&page=User:{{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} block log] • [{{fullurl:Special:BlockList|action=search&ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} active blocks] • [{{fullurl:Special:GlobalBlockList|ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [{{fullurl:Special:AbuseLog|wpSearchUser={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} abuse filter log] • [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=newusers&user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} creation log] • change block settings • [{{fullurl:Special:BlockList|action=unblock&ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} unblock] • [{{fullurl:Special:CheckUser|user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}&reason={{urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}, unblock request}}}} checkuser] ([{{fullurl:Special:CheckUserLog|cuSearchType=target&cuSearch={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} log]) ) {{clear}}

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hindu temples in Thalaivankottai


A tag has been placed on Draft:Hindu temples in Thalaivankottai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)