User talk:Durrani khurasan

November 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Durrani Empire. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  17:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Ahmad Shah Durrani
Welcome! I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. I haven’t been active here for several years, but I’m sure someone can help you at that page either by making the requested change or explaining why not. I’d recommend reading up on how Wikipedia operates first, then gather references about the subject and consider how to blend the new information into the existing article. Happy editing! Older and ... well older (talk) 01:51, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

From royal ark you can get more information Durrani khurasan (talk) 18:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Durrani Empire
Your edits at Durrani Empire have now been reverted three times by three different users for the same reason: you are providing no valid sources for these extensive changes. Your claim that you have seen this history in many books is insufficient; you must actually provide us the names of the books. Please do not make these changes again without discussing the matter at Talk:Durrani Empire, or you will risk running afoul of Wikipedia's three revert rule which can get you blocked. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:01, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I will make the same comment about the rest of your edits: you need reliable sources. "I have ancient knowledge" and "other editors are wrong" are poor edit summaries; if you dispute the content of articles, please raise the issues at the relevant talk pages, and be prepared to provide sources for your preferred versions other than simply "I know better". WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:07, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Just tell me who you are then i will send you source and what i m telling is truth you are from a different place you dont know nothing about durrani and about pashtoon Durrani khurasan (talk) 18:00, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Durrani Empire shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Your edits are wrong you are putting wrong material so what i was doing i was doing to correct it and you again violate the rule and put wrong and unneeded material because you dont want to put right information because your cia and other free nelson told you to put wrong information Durrani khurasan (talk) 18:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.
 * Your edits have now been undone by SIX different editors. Have you gotten the message yet? WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:56, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

I will tell you again you dont know nothing about Durrani empire and Pashtoon i will send you source but who you are Durrani khurasan (talk) 18:04, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Wrong and uncorrect information is edited by users
You dont have to edit wrong information because someone have order on you in that case you are guilty because you are hiding truth Durrani khurasan (talk) 18:12, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

For example max is editting that he is max and you are editting that he is not max so what is your problem Durrani khurasan (talk) 18:15, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikidan61
This man is putting wrong and uncorrect un usfull information Durrani khurasan (talk) 18:16, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Your edits on Durrani Empire have been reverted by SIX different editors, and all for the same reason: you have provided no sources for your changes. (Also, less of a problem, but still a problem: your list of ancestors is overly long and unformatted, making the article rather difficult to read.) Unless you can provide a source for your change, and gain consensus to make the change, you will continue to be in violation of Wikipedia guidelines. This is a collaborative platform where editors work together to create what everyone agrees is the best article; not simply what you believe is the best article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Durrani Empire, you may be blocked from editing. Info-Screen::Talk 18:29, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring at Durrani Empire
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk)

The material was copied directly from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:56, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User talk:WikiDan61. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 11:18, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Please don't use Wikipedia articles or self-published books as sources
You also added the name of a person to the name of a clan, which made no sense. In addition, Wikipedia cannot claim as fact that anyone is the son of Qais Abdur Rashid as he may never have existed. We also need page numbers and publishers when you cite books, and if there are 25 volumes obviously which one. Doug Weller talk 15:37, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Ibrahim Sari Saraband moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ibrahim Sari Saraband, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:14, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ibrahim Sari Saraband for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ibrahim Sari Saraband is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Sari Saraband until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 19:36, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Article benefits
Well thanks for understanding the article .this article will sovle many of the problems belong to viewers and edditers. It will help us on many article already been created.the article much refence belong to wikipedia Further i will explain it on that page Durrani khurasan (talk) 19:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Ibrahim sari saraband
I have added more reference to this. Journal of asiatic society of bengal volume 24 page 449 claim this history there is to much information there and this history is teached to genereations of generstions they teach this history to their decendent it also exist in that shape.many books claim it.also search royalark.net in this page click on the Afghanistan tab so royal lines will appear to you search there this. Ibrahim is his Islamic name and sur bannae,sari saraband, sarbani are nicknames Durrani khurasan (talk) 20:56, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you want your new information to affect the deletion discussion, you'll have to make comments at Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Sari Saraband. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:01, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sharif ud Din


A tag has been placed on Sharif ud Din requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Daiyusha (talk) 12:24, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:08, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 13:21, 3 December 2018 (UTC)