User talk:Durresaryl1

March 2012
Please refrain from interfering with the Rita Ora article in any manner. It is evident that you have nothing constructive to add and your edits are of the precise nature that has prevented others of your sort from playing with the article - I speak of single-issue only accounts. You are fortunate that your account was activated prior to the page protection activation. If you wish to use the talk page, you are only permitted to add to it but you may not amend or blank large sections as you have done. Regarding Rita Ora's opinion of Kosovo and Albania being one nation and on the basis that Kosovo has a 90% majority, I am afraid that these details have no relevance to the manner in which we present her statistics. What matters is the legal status of Kosovo at the time of her birth, in other words, the status quo per the decision of her parents when choosing where to live when she was born. I ask you not to edit the article again or I shall make a formal report. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 18:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been reported for this edit. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 19:56, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Origin of Rita Ora
Hello Durresaryl1! Do you have a source that Rita Ora's origin is Prishtina? This says that Rita Ora's origin is Shkodra. --Olsi (talk) 22:57, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop reverting the information on Rita Ora. Allow me to use the source you provided to replace the incorrect one. Thank you. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 16:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Durresaryl1 - I realise you are new so please reply here, or click on my talk and leave comments there. When you make comments on the article, it shows as such and to outsiders it looks like vandalism when it isn't.

I appreciate you know the family and I believe your source that she is from Pristina. If you look at how I have changed the edit, it now says Pristina and if you click on the reference [1], you'll see it is the citation you provided. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 16:56, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rita Ora with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Slazenger  (Contact Me) 17:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rita Ora. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rita Ora was changed by Durresaryl1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90128 on 2012-03-23T20:49:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 21:41, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 09:44, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 11:49, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi, your comment was deleted from the talk page of the Talk:Rita Ora because you (accidentally I presume) deleted many other comments. I've added it back and signed it for you. I urge you to further engage in discussion in the article talk page if you don't want to be blocked again. Nil Einne (talk) 21:59, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Rita Ora dispute
A new section on the talk page has been introduced to resolve the origin dispute. Please feel free to leave any comments here. Thanks. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 07:08, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 15:14, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Your edits
Can I request that you observe the historical accuracy policy for Rita Ora concerning her place of birth. I see that ever since you opened an account, your contributions are dominated by attempts to emphasise Kosovo as the sovereign nation of her birthplace with no regard for the controversy this creates given the circumstances. As editors we have NPOV ways of handling matters regarding Kosovo and the standard display on Rita Ora's article very much observes this. It is stated she is born in Yugoslavia, present-day Kosovo, and this serves every purpose. The article is not made better when you blank the sovereign country. If you oppose historical accuracy and believe Kosovo should awarded pride of place despite the hard work that has gone into creating the Kosovo-note template and other measures aimed at neutral presentation, may I suggest you open a discussion on the relevant project pages. If you believe Yugoslavia as birthplace to be incorrect concerning Rita Ora, please explain your reasoning on Talk:Rita Ora; but I ask that you stop removing the country of birth with immediate effect as this is now tiresome and evidently non-constructive. Thank you. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 18:24, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Once and for all, can you please stop making unconstructive edits such as this? The place to voice your opinion is the tak page, and Kosovo being overwhelmingly ethnic Albanian makes no difference to her country of birth and does not make things complicated. We observe historical accuracy for all subjects on the site. The next time you make a contribution of that nature, I believe I will be justified to report the disruption to admins once again. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 17:09, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 22:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for returning the exact same edits that run contrary to WP:CONSENSUS and references that got you blocked last time. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 22:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Rita Ora, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are not a new user and you have had enough time to familiarise yourself with the observed conventions on birthplace presentation. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 16:16, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

✅. You have been reported. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 18:44, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued edit-warring to restore your preferred version at Rita Ora. You have been blocked twice previously for the same issues and still refuse to communicate with other editors regarding your desired changes, as such I have blocked you indefinitely. This block could be 3 minutes, 30 days, or 300 years depending on whether you can agree that you will seek consensus for your proposed edit on the article talk page and will edit in a collaborative manner. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)