User talk:Dusnama

Lee Labrada
Hey Dusnama. I just want to give a bit of an explanation why your edit was undone at the article Lee Labrada. I'm not the editor who undid it - as you can see on the article's history page, that was user MrOllie. I agree with his decision, though.

On Wikipedia, every single statement has to come from a source that is reliable for that statement - see the verifiability policy for details. A Wikipedia article should be primarily based on what is said about the subject in sources that are reliable, secondary and independent from the subject. So if you want to say something in a Wikipedia article, don't just add it - find a reliable source for it first. And ideally, when writing an article you don't start with what you want to say, but start with finding sources and then summarise those sources in the article.

So, your edit was reverted because it added a lot of unsourced content. Because almost all of that unsourced content was about achievements of the subject, and because you didn't always describe those achievements in a neutral way, your edit was considered promotional. You did provide some sources, but for only a small part of the content, and most of those sources were not very reliable - I think I saw some blogs and low-quality reporting.

Please keep this in mind for your future edits. If you have any questions or comments about this, you can start a discussion on my talk page, user talk:PJvanMill. You can also reply here and link to my user page in your comment - the link will send me a notification. Kind regards from  PJvanMill ) talk ( 16:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)


 * If you use an inline citation for a statement, make sure the statement is actually supported by the source! False inline citations may be seen as misleading.
 * And again, you added a bunch of unsourced material. Stop that. Kind regards from  PJvanMill ) talk ( 14:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)