User talk:Dutchcop

Speedy deletion nomination of Adam cowan


A tag has been placed on Adam cowan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Diego Sanchez, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you.  «Golgofrinchian»  ∞talk∞  23:29, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Mir. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you.  «Golgofrinchian»  ∞talk∞  01:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Mir, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you.  «Golgofrinchian»  ∞talk∞  01:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to George Sotiropoulos. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dl2000 (talk) 01:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Mir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 01:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 01:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)