User talk:Duty2love/archive1

Archive 2007
Comments are welcome!!

No offense intended, but I suspect you should be aware of Wikipedia's policy on sockpuppetry. If you are someone's sockpuppet (and I'm not saying you are, but you do appear to be a single purpose account), you will be caught and blocked. If you aren't, my apologies for the intrusion. IPSOS (talk) 04:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Ah, I am glad to hear that! I hope you take time to improve the articles with cited information. IPSOS (talk) 23:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Rfc/user for Shashwat pandey
Dear Duty2love,

Users Sethie and Reneeholle have filed an Rfc for user Shashwat pandey.

Because you have contributed to either the Sahaj Marg page, the Shri Ram Chandra Mission page, or both, we would appreciate it if you could provide your comments of this user at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Shashwat_pandey

Here are the guidelines for responding :


 * Other users can endorse a view (under 1.7), by adding their signature to the list after that view. Along with their signature, they may wish to offer a clarifying comment of one or two sentences, for example if they agree with all but one particular part of the view. Longer responses than that should probably go into their own "View" section.
 * Anyone can endorse any view, regardless of whether or not they are outside parties, inside parties, or even the subject of the RfC. Ideally, there will be some view(s) that both sides of the involved parties can endorse.
 * You may endorse as many views as you wish. You may also endorse the original RfC statement (under section 1.7), and/or the subject's response (under section 2).

Thank you for your time. It is greatly appreciated! 18:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Newbie Tip
Dear Duty2love,

I notice that when you sign things, your name appears in red (as mine did until a few days ago). Apparently this signals to admins and others that you're a newbie and your posts draw greater attention. Not that there's any problem with that but apparently if you post even a period on your user page, it turns all of your signatures to blue. Thought I'd pass on the tip! Welcome!

Renee Renee 10:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
CASE CLOSED: NO SOCKS.


 * Very interesting!!! Rushmi, a new user who appears on our discussion a lil over 2 weeks ago, questioning everything right from the beginning, then making edits on stub without consensus, then blogging the discussion and finally accusing me of sock puppet account, all with in 19 days or so. Anyways, thanks Rushmi, for making your intentions clear to all of us. Let me start a proper response to this action. Duty2love 18:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Duty2love, THANK you for alerting me to this! I had no idea this was going on! No wonder he's been so quiet on the Sahaj Marg page.

As to you and I, we don't have to worry about anything -- they'll do a checkuser and see we're completely different people.

I have suspected since the beginning that Rushmi is a sockpuppet of Shashwat pandey. I can't remember if you were around when he was around? But, since Rushmi appeared I have been gathering evidence for a sockpuppet case. I wanted to wait and see if he would/could edit in good faith and I guess I have my answer, huh?

Will you respond to the allegations? That would be good. I'll do the same and I'll let you know when I file the sockpuppet case against him.

Thank you again for alerting me. Best wishes, Renee  --Renee 18:43, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Duty2love, here is the sock report I filed on Rushmi. The more I searched the more sure I am that Rushmi/Shashwat are the same (even spelling words wrong the same way).  If true, then this is just part of Shashwat's harassment campaign toward me (and sorry it has extended to you), which will only bite him in the butt.  Best wishes, Renee 21:38, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Dear Duty2love, This case has been closed. I removed the templates. At least Shashwat/Rushmi was exposed so something good came out of it. I'm glad we can all move on. Good luck in your future editing! Renee --Renee 11:41, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

sock case resolved
Duty2love, Good news! The Rushmi/Shashwat sock case has been resolved here. Even better news, the harassment sock case against us has been reviewed and no evidence was found of sockpuppetry (obviously!). They'll confirm with a "checkuser" and then I think you can delete the sock templates from both this and your user face page. As I mentioned on the Sahaj Marg talk page, an AFD has already been filed for the Sahaj Marg page. If consensus is for deleting the related group pages, I'll post here and let you know. Good luck in your future edits. --Renee 13:13, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Shri Ram Chandra Mission (Chennai)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Shri Ram Chandra Mission (Chennai), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. Renee 22:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Shri Ram Chandra Mission (Shahjahanpur)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Shri Ram Chandra Mission (Shahjahanpur), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. Renee 22:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Institute of Sri Ram Chandra Consciousness
An article that you have been involved in editing, Institute of Sri Ram Chandra Consciousness, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. Renee 22:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Friendly heads-up
Dear Duty2love, I notice you added some text to the closed sockpuppet case. I don't think anyone is supposed to add anything after it has been closed (according to the banner at the top). I'm not sure if it matters or not but thought I'd give you a heads up. Best wishes, Renee  --Renee 12:38, 24 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm sure it was okay. I probably shouldn't have even mentioned it.  I'm still learning the rules myself.  Best wishes, Renee  --Renee 00:22, 27 September 2007 (UTC)