User talk:Dutyterms

Edit warring on Liancourt Rocks
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Cheers, Komdori 13:30, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see this link for information on the subsequent report. --Cheers, Komdori 13:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Please read the discussion pages
As discussed, there is disagreement to what the newly added picture actually is. It is your burden to prove that it is what you say it is, not our to prove it is not. Additionally, you may not revert more than three times in a 24 hour period. You've been warned twice about this, and if you continue reverting, you will be reported and blocked from editing. --Cheers, Komdori 13:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

AIV
Thank you for making a report at Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. However, violations of the 3RR rules is not a subject for WP:AIV, especially on a userpage.  E LIMINATOR JR  14:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.  E LIMINATOR JR  14:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Naming Policy (alphabetical order)
You are misunderstanding Wikipedia Policy.

Please carefully read

WP:NCGN

" alphabetic order of their respective languages, i.e., (Armenian name1, Belarusian name2, Czech name3). "

In other words the order is alphabetic by language name.

Armenian is a language. Belarusian is a language. Japanese is a language. Korean is a language. Dokdo is NOT a language. Takeshima is NOT a language. So we go (1) Japanese, (2) Korean.

This is Wikipedia Policy and we must respect it.

Thankyou.

Macgruder 15:10, 21 August 2007 (UTC)