User talk:DuvellsCat

test

John Christodoulou 'Controversies' section - Removed Due to False Information.
This page contains inaccurate information as follows:

Some 'anonymous' person has added the “Controversies" section to John Christodoulou wikipedia entry which contains completely incorrect information.

Such as 'where Christodoulou's Marathon Estates was removed from controlling the site by the property tribunal in October 2016.' John Christodulou does not own or has ever owned Marathon Estates.

The word Controversies just by itself is a slur to Christodoulou as stated the information provided is incorrect.

Please remove this section as I thought Wikipedia deals in fact not peoples incorrect/false opinions. Interesting that the person who added this has posted anonymously so they can't be that certain that the information that they have added is correct.

John Christodoulou
This page contains inaccurate information as follows: Some 'anonymous' person has added the “Controversies" section to John Christodoulou wikipedia entry which contains completely incorrect information.

Such as 'where Christodoulou's Marathon Estates was removed from controlling the site by the property tribunal in October 2016.' John Christodulou does not own or has ever owned Marathon Estates.

The word Controversies just by itself is a slur to Christodoulou as stated the information provided is incorrect.

Please remove this section as I thought Wikipedia deals in fact not peoples incorrect/false opinions. Interesting that the person who added this has posted anonymously so they can't be that certain that the information that they have added is correct.

Regards DuvellsCat (talk) 08:46, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

John Christodoulou 'Controversies' section - Removed Due to False Information.
Its been 24 hours since I last heard from you. Can you please remove the Controversies section that is still there. Thank you.

DuvellsCat (talk) 14:27, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

John Christodoulou 'Controversies' section Again - Please review below and remove
Edward

This page still contains inaccurate information as follows: “Controversies" Christodoulou's business practices have attracted considerable media attention. The Times notes that "his company has been challenged by residents of a luxury development of more than 300 flats who complained they were being charged sky-high service charges and unreasonably high sums for repairs."[24] This is a reference to Canary Riverside, where Christodolou-appointed Marathon Estates was removed from controlling the site by the property tribunal in October 2016. It found that Marathon Estates "has been unable to produce accurate financial information on time, including budgets and accounts, has not engaged with leaseholders and has a muddled hierarchy of command."[25]

Allegations of chronic mismanagement of 1 West India Quay have emerged in a Sunday Times feature on the leasehold property scandal.[26] Leaseholders there have taken legal action against Christodoulou over expensive energy bills, raising concerns that they have been subsidising his commercial interest on the site.[27] In May 2014, they won the right to form a Recognised Tenants Association, despite Christodolou having hired a QC and spent £74,000 in trying to block their efforts.[28]

Christodolou has also been named in parliament, with the MP for Poplar and Limehouse claiming that the litigation and threats faced by the court-appointed manager at Canary Riverside are "little short of harassment".[29] A former secretary of the 1 West India Quay residents' association has been subjected to a defamation threat by Christodolou's lawyers, as have 100 leaseholders at neighbouring Canary Riverside.[30] In July 2018, his lawyers unsuccessfully sought to prevent the local MP, Jim Fitzpatrick, from raising the case of Canary Riverside in parliament. It had been claimed that Fitzpatrick's intervention could breach sub judice rules ”

The statement is inaccurate because: •	The Title “Controversies” implies that Mr Christdoulou is involved in something controversial or has done something wrong, neither of which are true; •	Mr Christodulou business practices have not “attracted considerable media attention”; •	It is not correct that "his company has been challenged by residents of a luxury development”; •	Mr Christodoulou did not hire a QC or spend any money on the West India Quay application; •	Leaseholders have not taken legal action against Mr Christodoulou at West India Quay; •	The “harassment” allegation was made in Parliament and so protected by parliamentary privilege. Had it not been then Christodoulou would have made a claim for defamation.  That defamation is however now being disseminated by your website; •	Mr Christdoulou lawyers didn’t “silence” an MP. As you know I have attempted to correct the inaccuracy by making the appropriate edit over the last couple of weeks and contacting you and your editors via this/my talk/messageboard as you have requested. The inaccuracy amounts to an unlawful processing of Mr Christodoulou’s personal data. It affects his personally in relationships concerning his work and as such causes him distress and financial loss. The inaccuracy cannot be justified by wikipedia editors relying on source material, which itself is inaccurate. In the premises, Mr Christodoulou is entitled to demand its deletion under UK and European legal provisions such as the tort of misuse of private information based on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to privacy); and under Article 17 of the European General Data Protection Regulation (right of erasure). In the case of Article 8, Mr Christodoulou is entitled to a reasonable expectation of privacy and there is no countervailing public interest in the publication of the inaccuracy. With regard to Article 17, Mr Christodoulou has not and does not consent to the processing of the inaccuracy about him and no legitimate reason that overrides Mr Christodoulou's privacy right can justify ongoing processing. The inaccuracy also forms the basis of a complaint in libel, in relation to which Mr Christodoulou reserves his rights. For all of the above reasons, Mr Christodolou requests suppression of the inaccuracy from the Wikipedia page concerning him. In other words, please delete all paragraphs under the heading “Controversies”. Please also provide immediately the names of the parties who have been adding this material to your website. I look forward to hearing from you within the next 2 days in reply to my request. DuvellsCat (talk) 11:35, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:29, 27 June 2019 (UTC)