User talk:Dv2012

Speedy deletion nomination of DV 2012 fiasco


A tag has been placed on DV 2012 fiasco, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. &mdash; Abhishek Talk to me 17:00, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at DV 2012 fiasco
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from DV 2012 fiasco, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:20, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with DV 2012 fiasco. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the article's . Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:22, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with DV 2012 fiasco. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. &mdash; Abhishek Talk to me 17:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at DV 2012 fiasco
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with DV 2012 fiasco. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with DV 2012 fiasco. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:43, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with DV 2012 fiasco. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at DV 2012 fiasco, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &mdash; Abhishek Talk to me 17:51, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Dv2012, does not meet our username policy. '''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).''' A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash; slakr \ talk / 05:48, 19 May 2011 (UTC)