User talk:DvigartaDogra123

August 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Saidpur, Islamabad, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Idell (talk) 15:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for suggesting. I will be keep this in mind from next time DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 14:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, DvigartaDogra123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Zorawar Singh Kahluria does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 15:42, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Hi the source of the information has been referenced and mentioned in form of citation. DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 15:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Skingo12. I noticed that in this edit to Vaisakhi, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Skingo12 (talk) 10:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

The same content is moved to another area of the article. It is change of sequence DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 11:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello DvigartaDogra123! Your additions to Indian cookbooks have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted.  All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Falana Dikhana


A tag has been placed on Falana Dikhana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:18, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Why is the article deleted? It carried all vital information and citations? DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 13:25, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * It isn't deleted yet. None of the citations were actually about the subject and at least one don't even mention the subject. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

The subject is about documenting discrimination in some laws of India on social issues especially reservation and SC/ST Act. And it is mentioned in these source. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2020/07/05/how-the-reservation-system-of-india-is-defining-a-new-era-of-human-rights-violation/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

https://www.hindupost.in/politics/ground-report-by-online-news-portal-falana-dikhana-blows-lid-off-hathras-gang-rape-case/

Both of these have been included in the article DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 13:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * As I said none of those references are about the subject of the article. A one sentence mention isn't enough to claim or establish notability. The guidelines say A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject see WP:GNG. Fully half of your references are authored by Shubham Sharma who founded Falana Dikhana and therefore they are not independent. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

There are two large paragraphs mentioing importance in the article. Please reread. And its two sources. One of the source is in International Media. And what about so many of other references from neutral sources ? DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 14:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Writing about a notable event doesn't make the writer notable. There aren't "so many of other references from neutral sources". The references are either written by the subject of the article or they barely mention the subject. Notfrompedro (talk) 14:07, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Except for one/two article there has been no other authored by the founder. Please do refer to other sources used in the article. DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 14:13, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * OK. This one doesn't even mention Falana Dikhana and this one has one sentence. Notfrompedro (talk) 14:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

And this article mentions Falana Dikhana thrice. Literally has a long paragraph dedicated to it

https://www.hindupost.in/politics/ground-report-by-online-news-portal-falana-dikhana-blows-lid-off-hathras-gang-rape-case/

Why is this being not taken into consideration? DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 14:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * As I have already told you one article isn't significant coverage. None of the rest are valid as they are either written by someone connected to the article subject or they don't mention the article subject. Notfrompedro (talk) 14:28, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

No, this article by Hindu Post is written by some other platform. And it mentions a long paragraph on the subject. It mentions the subject name three times. This cannot be ignored. Do check once again. https://www.hindupost.in/politics/ground-report-by-online-news-portal-falana-dikhana-blows-lid-off-hathras-gang-rape-case/ DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 14:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * For the third time, one article is not significant coverage. I never denied the existence or content of that single article but as I said none of the rest are valid as they are either written by someone connected to the article subject or they don't mention the article subject. Notfrompedro (talk) 15:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

The author of the both article is different. How can you be sure it is by someone related to subject? DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 16:27, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 16:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Either User:PunjabSingh1008 is your sock, or they are a meat puppet, possibly another member of Falana Dikhana. Both sock puppetry and meat puppetry are policy violations.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:00, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jiten Jain (August 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Jiten Jain may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:DvigartaDogra123 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bkissin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:DvigartaDogra123 reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 17:41, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 09:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Unexplained Removal
Hello, I noticed you are removing content from pages without properly explaining. Can you explain why you have removed content in Vigna mungo and not mentioned about it in edit summary. Kindly refrain from unexplained content removal. signed, 511KeV    (talk) 15:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Please check new content has been added and repetition was removed. Vigna Mungo Names section had names in two categories one derived from Proto Dravidian root and other from Sanskrit root. One name was written in both sections. Removed that repetitive name from the wrong section. DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 16:45, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thanks for the barnstar. Will keep on contributing DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 12:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to List of Indian dairy products have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 20:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes thanks. Even I wanted to do undo it DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 05:06, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Panchratna Dal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Alright. Thanks for informing. Correction done DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 06:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Panjiri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deva.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Please do not capitalise food names
Food names are not capitalised, except for individual words that are a person's or place's name (like oysters Rockefeller or chicken Kiev). Please do your best to correct these errors; they create quite a lot of work for copyeditors. Thanks. -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  19:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Alright. Will keep this in mind from next time. DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 19:12, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Again: Please do not capitalise food names. As only one example, "chutney" should never be capitalised unless it is the first word of a sentence or part of a registered trademark (as in Major Grey's Chutney). Please make appropriate corrections. Thanks. -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  16:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your edits to Barfi
Hello, I'm Ram1751. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Barfi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Ram1751 (talk) 23:28, 1 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The contributions are done via poper sources. What is wrong in the edits? DvigartaDogra123 (talk) 01:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)