User talk:DwayCudi12

January 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Patrick Hape, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Patrick Hape was changed by DwayCudi12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858426 on 2012-01-10T01:17:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Drew Wayland


A tag has been placed on Drew Wayland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the importance of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Banaticus (talk) 01:25, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lyme disease‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Color blindness‎, you may be blocked from editing. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:17, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Color blindness. ─═Klilidiplomus █ Talk═─ 19:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Color blindness, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. /\ talk←   Aviyal   →track ) /\ 19:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC)