User talk:Dwight666

Test message to myself (new user). I hope that's OK with everyone.

John Edwards
Hi, there! Here you fully reverted my edit without, in my opinion, sufficiently explaining it. If you disagree with my version, which I have just now re-submitted, please go to the talk page and explain your concerns there first, maybe we can work out a better version together. The version you reverted to, however, was simply wrong in that it said Krauthammer was reacting to a misquote, which he didn't. Furthermore, it is precarious and totally unnecessary to quote from Krauthammer. This is my opinion. Please tell me yours. —Kncyu38 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your reply. Concerning the Edwards article: I was not offended in any way. The reason I reverted your edit to that section is that there has been some debate as to the exact wording. Two different versions ("yours" and another) were reverted back and forth several times, but nobody seemed interested in rewriting it, so I proposed "my" version. As stated in my edit summary, I do absolutely not insist on that exact wording. If you have any suggestion how it could be improved, I'll gladly discuss it with you here. Mind you, though, that you do not need my approval. If you have an idea, you are welcome to be bold at any time.
 * Concerning technical aspects: Yes, you did it correctly, except that if you press the "+" button next "edit this page", and then enter a Subject/headline for the new discussion, it will automatically be inserted as " == Subject/headline you entered == " and appear in my table of contents. I adjusted it accordingly, see here. If you want to add a TOC to your own talk page right now, simply put " " on the page and save it (further info). Regards, —Kncyu38 (talk • contribs) 19:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

General Question
helpme If someone posts a comment to my User-talk Dwight666 page, is there some sort of notification method so that I don't overlook it? I wouldn't check my User-talk page that often. Also, same question going the other direction: if I place a comment on another's User-talk page, do I need to do anything else to alert them. TIA, Dwight Dwight666 (talk) 06:42, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

P.S. I also seem to have a nasty text-wrapping problem in the paragraph above. ?????
 * Hi, to answer both your questions:
 * There's a unmissable yellow bar that appears at the top of every page until you visit your talk page:


 * IF a line begins with a space character, Wikipedia believes it must be displayed that way. What happened here is that the helpme template ends with a new line. The spaces that you added to separate it from your question were then considered as part of a new line.
 * I hope that helps! If you need further help, please don't hesitate to post on my talk page or to put   followed by your question on this page. --  Luk  talk 08:46, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Your edits to Acrochordon
Regarding this edit, we can not leave it there without a reliable source (WP:MEDRS). Richiez (talk) 13:22, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

December 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Quicken, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 13:39, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Dwight666. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! 220  of  Borg 16:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. 220  of  Borg 16:09, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Carnival Is Over, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twilight zone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 21 April 2016 (UTC) --- Thanks. I fixed it. Dwight666 (talk) 16:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sina Doering


A tag has been placed on Sina Doering, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SamHolt6 (talk) 04:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Tremors (film), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:21, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ultrafan


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ultrafan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ChunnuBhai (talk) 07:39, 13 October 2020 (UTC)