User talk:Dybber1505

September 2018
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 331dot (talk) 12:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Editing from Sanovosocialmedia has been blocked, however, there is no advertising or promotion intended
Someone else will review this request, but Wikipedia is not a forum for your company to tell the world about itself. Your company should do that on its own website. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is only interested in what independent reliable sources state about a subject (like a company) that show how it meets the relevant notability guidelines, in this case, WP:ORG. Wikipedia has little to no interest in what a company wants to say about itself. Please read WP:COI about conflict of interest, and WP:PAID about the paid editing policy(which you must comply with per Wikipedia's Terms of Use as a company representative). 331dot (talk) 13:11, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much for answering. I completely agree with you! However, should not all pages of companies be blocked then? Let's say that someone completely neutral wanted to write an article about "sanovo technology group" with credible and neutral sources would it then be allowed?[User:Sanovosocialmedia|Sanovosocialmedia]] (talk) 15:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * A company will merit an article on Wikipedia if it meets the notability guidelines at WP:ORG; not every company merits an article here, even within the same field. If someone independent of your company saw in depth coverage of it in independent reliable sources(which does not include press releases, routine business announcements, or brief mentions) and decided to write an article about it, they would likely succeed. If unblocked, and you have independent sources with significant coverage of your company, you could visit Requested Articles to request that an uninvolved editor write an article; however, that page is severely backlogged and will be some time before such a page is created.  I would also note that, to be unblocked, you will need to indicate what it is other than your company that you want to edit about.   331dot (talk) 13:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for the clarification, I appreciate that you took the time to respond [User:Sanovosocialmedia|Sanovosocialmedia]] (talk) 15:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)


 * I have globally renamed Sanovosocialmedia to Dybber1505, and someone else will review your unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Since you won't be permitted to directly edit about your company, what other subjects do you want to edit about? 331dot (talk) 11:46, 9 September 2018 (UTC)