User talk:Dylanfromthenorth/Archive 4

Moor Beer
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Moor Beer, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Moor Beer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Monkeytheboy (talk) 00:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Mos annual2005.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mos annual2005.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Moths
Aye, indeed. Apologies if they're coming a bit thick and fast again, but I'm starting to feel like I'd like to get them finished sometime this lifetime. How people tell the damn things apart I'll never know; all I ever see is a pair of wings and some fuzzy bits before I squash them into oblivion. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 02:33, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Warmyourheart.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Warmyourheart.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Aaron Neville album
I've never had anyone mention that the 'stub' wasn't up to scratch in my other musician page creations. Anyhow, I'm happy to partially oblige. Now, as I can see from some other websites, there's some mention of Aaron covering Randy Newman's "Louisana 1927", "Everyone plays the fool" written by K. Williams, R. Clark, J.R. Bailley, "It Feels Like Rain" was written by John Hiatt, "Somewhere, Somebody" written by Max Gronenthal, Andrew David Kastner, Larry John McNally, "Don't Go Please Stay", written by Burt Bacharach, Bob Hilliard, "With You In Mind" written by Allen Toussaint, "That's The Way She Loves" written by Allen Toussaint, "Angola Bound" written by Aaron Neville, Charles Neville, "Close Your Eyes" written by Chuck Willis, "La Vie Dansante" written by Jimmy Buffett, Michael Utley, Will Jennings, "Warm Your Heart" written by Tom Dowd, Jerry Wexler, Ahmet Ertegun, "I Bid You Goodnight" a traditional Bahamian gospel song, "Ave Maria" seems to be a traditional song. Try0yrt (talk) 10:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Okay, then, silly me I suppose, Thanks for that. Try0yrt (talk) 10:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, you've certainly upgraded the page to a high level, I have to admit, a job well done indeed. Whether I could fill in the details very well myself, is something I very much doubt, probably don't have such patience for that. I've put up the discography for ease of access, I suppose, and making the page was to highlight an album that is quite worth (in my opinion) enough to listen to. I guess this is a sort of unequal partnership of getthing the page to 'noteworthy' status. I didn't do much or the bulk of it. Ta, and perhaps we'll chance some other time to contribute on an article that we both can contribute well upon. Try0yrt (talk) 13:34, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

More moths
Yeah - I'm trying to do it quietly, and not overload the system. If it's any consolation, apparently I'm on a couple of bots' auto-patrol lists, so you can always hide the patrolled edits when you're patrolling. That might help matters some. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 19:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * groan* Makes me sorry they aren't lists of grasshopper genera. Although I suppose you could have told me that it wasn't a "moth"-er.  Although that could be misconstrued... --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 19:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Lecturers
I didn't want to pile on too much at the AfD, but just to answer your comment: Reisz was speedied, and duly deleted, as was Morier-Genoud, and the author was advised to read WP:PROF, but he just re-created them and added more, so I thought it best to go to AfD and sort them all out together. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 08:48, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Chewlips.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chewlips.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 06:54, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

The Caledonia Night Sky Co. and Jerry LaBuy
In the AFD I intended to nominate both articles. If you look at my talk page somone has stated that I didn't make that clear so I have made it more obvious. Hopefully you were aware but if not can you look at the other article too. Theresa Knott | token threats 14:06, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Macheda
Please carry on Spiderone (talk) 16:36, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah it shocks me how bad the Grand National articles are. I mean Liam Treadwell doesn't even have an article Spiderone (talk) 16:39, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Big Life
Hi Dylan, nice find for the sources for Articles for deletion/Big Life. I dunno how the hell I missed ones like that in my searches. In light of that, I've put in for the AfD to be withdrawn. Cheers.  Esradekan Gibb   "Talk" 07:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Treasureisland1999.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Treasureisland1999.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Bon Jovi
Sorry if I was a little incivil. I'm just angered by people who think "all charted singles are notable" and refuse to have them redirected, when WP:NSONGS clearly says that any stub about a song may be redirected. Do you have any objection to a redirect, as this is clearly never getting beyond stub status? My main concern is lack of sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 00:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Turtles Are Surprisingly Fast Swimmers
I had a hand at further expansion. Hope it meets with your approval. There were tremendous sources available through Google for its three release names: Turtles Are Surprisingly Fast Swimmers, Kame wa Igai to Hayaku Oyogu, and Turtles Swim Faster Than Expected. No wonder the nom might have missed. Translations always mean tougher searches. Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:04, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
Hi, I appreciate your words about good faith at Articles_for_deletion/MES_Pattambi. It was true that I worded the AFD badly, but I did have no malicious intent on use of the term foreign. So, I do appreciate what you said.  Wacko Jack O   12:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, it does seem like a lot of AFDs get sidetracked. Hopefully, your comments will steer things back on course. Wacko  Jack O   12:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

chew lips
hi this is my first time on here so i dont really know whats going on with this stuff?Boobscotch (talk) 19:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

TOMS Shoes
Please advise wheteher I have met your concerns. The article is much smaller now as I have removed fluff and addressed advert and pov. Best,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

A differnt subject
yeah i dont even get how to bloody write to you!!

ok i think i get what youre saying - i dont know how to give you proof of the nme reference - i mean, the issue's out tomorrow but i have the scanned review that i could send you?! basically this is my band, im tigs, and i didnt even know this page existed until someone emailed me. i just thought id make a couple of factual corrections but its way more complicated than i thought !! or maybe im just being a computer retard. thats also likely.

as for influences, obviously im just telling you who we're influenced by, though i have said these before in interviews that i could probably get you.

but to be honest i'll probably give up.

thanks for your help though!

T Boobscotch (talk) 22:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC) (?)

haha, not a popstar quite yet.

review will be there in nme. i spose the page will keep changing as we release more stuff anyway so im not going to worry about it. like i said, it was just a tipoff that i saw it.

not too bothered about the photo.

thanks for your help. if you want to get on the guestlist to a show sometime just have a look at our myspaz (on wiki page!) for gigs and drop me an email.

cheers.

T Boobscotch (talk) 08:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Chew Lips
Been meaning to say thanks a lot for bulking out the entry on the band Chew Lips! I was struggling to get it accepted but it's now looking v. good. Ta! Bbc richardb (talk) 09:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Stackedup.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Stackedup.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Q T C 09:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

chew lips history
hey

i work for ATC management and help look after the CHEW LiPS. We put their biog up and it seemed to be taken down. can this go back up?

Kieran —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kierankeycrosby (talk • contribs) 14:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

also.
can my membership status be updated so i can include some up to date images? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kierankeycrosby (talk • contribs) 14:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. I realize that my decision to open an AfD on the article may be contentious, but please try to actually discuss the issue, not accuse me of improperly bringing an article to AfD. Irbisgreif (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Irbisgreif (talk) 14:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Irbisgreif (talk) 15:07, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: Azad Asgarov
"Although you have just stated that "being the president of Pankration Federation of Azerbaijan meets the notability guideline"." He was getting on my nerves :) Is there a way to withdraw the nomination? Lida Vorig (talk) 19:19, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Richard Anthony Jay
Now that multiple new references have been added, are you now satisfied that Richard Anthony Jay satisfies Notability_(music) ? Burningpetals (talk) 22:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:LenkaAlbumCover.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:LenkaAlbumCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 01:18, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Question
For this, you stated neutral. However, you provided more evidence that there was no sources on the matter. Notability requires third party sources. We don't even know how "short" this "short film" is. Isn't that strong justification that the page should not exist? Ottava Rima (talk) 14:39, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Could you notify them, then? I have already exhausted google books and the rest on the matter. Wikipedia seems to be the primary source of information on the internet. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:44, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't sort it, so, if you know which list to place it in feel free. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:54, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Ottava Rima (talk) 15:05, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Got it on the list....
Apparently there is a need to verify the particpation of the notable individuls per point 2 of NF. WP:NTEMP is being forgotten, as some editors seem to act as if the GNG supercedes all other notability guideline when it actually doesn't. The top of the page at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film tells how to add articles to an AfD list for films. Each Wikiproject's page shows how to add to their list. Kinda easy actualy once you get the hang of it. Oh... I did make sure to give the author of the article a courtesy notice. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 16:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Personal attacks

 * It appears we have to indulge your burst of coprophilia. Could you please provide ISBNs for this book and for The Truth About Poop and Poop: A Natural History of the Unmentionable? from RHaworth on my other account.
 * You are not welcome here. Go away. I don't need to. Stop trolling and go away. Reverted to revision 306969051 by Esradekan; actually, lets just cut this crap out - it's unrelated to the deletion discussion - if you want to insult me use my talk page. removed trolling totally irrelevant to the deletion discussion Michig got away with all of that because everybody sided with him at ANI. That was on this account. I wonder where he read the invisible insult at. Joe Chill (talk) 21:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I find your berating of people who have a differing point of view than yours invalid. The !vote stands, it is not invalid and you can go read WP:AGF and WP:DICK until the cows come home. Do you know what I have been doing while you have been rambling on and making a mockery of this AfD? From NeutralHomer on this account. Everyone said that it wasn't a personal attack.
 * I believe you are truly more intelligent than that. From Edison on this account. He got away with it because everyone said that it wasn't a personal attack.
 * Joe, I'd like to point out you're coming across as the Wikipedia equivalent of the grumpy old man who comes out on his front porch and yells at the neighborhood kids who step on his lawn. From Hullaballoo Wolfowitz on this account. Everyone said that it wasn't a personal attack.
 * Harasser Imnotacoolguy harassed me with sockpuppets and no admin would help me because I didn't explain the problem in an essay at ANI.This is on my other account.

I have a hatred of most admins because of all their horrible work in ANI, AFD, their talk pages, how they block people when they shouldn't, and how they choose their favorite editors and will defend them no matter what. Joe Chill (talk)

Raymond Leslie Morris
I thought you might like to take a look at Raymond Leslie Morris again per your comments in Articles for deletion/Raymond Leslie Morris. Thanks! Location (talk) 18:32, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Squeezing through CSD
Hi Dylan! Thanks for your delete vote at Articles for deletion/Russian athlete. I initially felt the same way you seem to feel about it: It's crazy; someone just spent a minute for something as unnotable as this, and we have to spend several minutes to purge it. But now I see it differently: If that's crazy, then it's just as crazy as life itself. For me, that's what makes life - and working at Wikipedia - interesting. The border between right and wrong is fractal, like the edge of the Mandelbrot set. There are some areas that are clearly in the set, and some that are clearly outside, but the interesting thing happens at the border. A drink just happens to be one of those topics that may be notable, or it may be something somebody just made up in a minute. You don't know without investing some time. CSD is intentionally just for no-brainer cases. We could refine our criteria, but that would make them less of a no-brainer overall. I think the way it is is good enough. Cheers! &mdash; Sebastian 15:13, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

nerd.
umm. hi dylan. i'm not really sure what people write in these. i didn't even realize how hardcore of a wikipedian you were until tonight. whose the nerd now hmmmmmm?? :P Hibzy (talk) 04:56, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Funny article i found about wikipedia
Here's something you should look at:

http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Wikipedia

Hellshock70 (talk) 01:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Hellshock70

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mark_steel_WhatsGoingOn.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Mark_steel_WhatsGoingOn.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 01:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Cheers
I've been lurking as an IP editor for a few years now, had to sign up to create a couple of articles when I came across some "redlinks" in a history book (that hadn't happened before, perhaps my reading's getting more obscure). I suppose "cogent" makes up for the nosiness :)  Holly25 (talk) 02:53, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Dwarves redirects
I made the attempt to compromise and save everyone the trouble. I offered to withdraw the AfD's on the Dwarves albums if Michig wanted to redirect them. . He has refused. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * There is nothing pointy about it. I guessed (correctly) that some editors would oppose redirects based on small reviews or trivial mentions. Past experience has shown me that fans go in and just undo redirects, even if a discussion on the talk page agreed. I didn't set out to nom them all at first. I stumbled across one of their albums and it was like pulling on a thread, every one I went to had the same problems. So rather than just ignore it and make it someone elses problem, I made the noms. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:NALBUMS says they may be reidrected, not must. I think they should be deleted, but I was willing to shortcut the process and agree to a redirect. Sorry if you don't approve, but I feel the nom is legit and that I made the effort to compromise. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Pepcid Complete
Please check the history of articles before nominating them for speedy deletion. There may be a revision in the history that addresses the concerns raised in the speedy deletion nomination (as was the case in the above article). Thanks, IronGargoyle (talk) 23:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Nivram
If you haven't already done so, your decision to take this to AfD might be affected by the fact that the band satisfy criterion #2 at Notability (music), therefore the notability requirement is satisfied. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:35, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:06, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Projectionist Page
As I understand it from my reading of the helps pages in Wikipedia, there is a proper dispute process to go through if you disagree with the contents of a page. I note you have effectively deleted the projectionist page without undergoing any of this due process. Normally you are supposed to tag the page with flags denoting your concerns and leave comments in the discussion page in order that the author(s) can address them. Please do not effectively vandalise this page by deleting it. OldProjectionist (talk) 06:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Noted your comments on original research. I have read some of the material on this and need a bit of time to read the rest. Some comments to date:

Some of the original research material seems to indicate that the only way we can author an article is to literally cut and paste from other sources. Surely this would lead to plagiarism problems?

I admit that the article is in one sense original research based on talking to many projectionists over many years and visiting many projection boxes. I found literature on the topic very hard to come by. There is of course a lot of highly technical literature sure as Richardson's Blue Book of Projection and the SMPTE publications but these are all very technical. The original article set out to detail what a projectionist is and does. However, it originally had too much jargon. I don't think it had any references either. I re-wrote it to remove the jargon.

In another sense it is not original research in that I have not introduced any new theories or suppositions but only re-iterated what is common knowledge in the industry obtained verbally from industry sources.

I need more guidance on what constitutes original research with respect to Wikipedia. If the only acceptable articles are based on cut and paste of other written material then I guess Wikipedia is not the place for this article. If articles can conform if they comply with current industry knowledge even where written material is sparse then it should be OK.

I will try to find some supporting material on the internet where I can. We could also put a comment in the discussion section asking others if they have know of any suitable references that are relevant

OldProjectionist (talk) 05:37, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

your NAC of Bellingham Bells

 * context: Articles for deletion/Bellingham Bells

While redirects can be discussed on the talk page, redirects are a typical outcome of a deletion discussion. It isn't too hard to read through the nomination and see what rationale for deletion was given.

I'd strongly suggest you to undo your NAC of the AFD and let it continue. If not, let me know and I'll take it to deletion review. tedder (talk) 17:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirects should be discussed on the talk page first, which it hasn't been. Since you aren't advancing an argument for deletion, the discussion does not belong at Articles for Deletion. While a redirect is a common outcome at AfD, that because consensus has come up with a better alternative than the nomination:- since you already believe redirect to be the best option, why not discuss it at the correct venue? Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 18:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * See Speedy keep carefully; I assume you were invoking the first reason, though you didn't meet all of the criteria of it. tedder (talk) 18:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review for Bellingham Bells
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Bellingham Bells. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. tedder (talk) 18:04, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry but that was really a pants NAC. Speedy keeping something that has only just been listed and has not been properly discussed is never going to fly and superimposes your opinion on top of the participants of the discussion - or in this case the potential participants as you never gave them a chance to comment. NAC are for non-controversial closes and this is never going to be that. I have reversed your AFD close and closed the DRV. The irony being that I am not currently an admin but I know which way this would go. Spartaz Humbug! 19:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The irony being that you've just inappropriately closed a DRV, and in the process had a pop at me appropriately closing an AfD? Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * yeah, I know, but any passing admin can overule me if they choose and my being an admin only requires me to make a request at BN for the bit to flipped back. Spartaz Humbug! 19:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Alex Henshall
Many thanks for the prompt around Alex Henshall. Reason for proposed deletion now added! Steve-Ho (talk) 12:05, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Was wir sind
FYI, The Was wir sind article has been updated. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 21:25, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyright violations
Hi, Dylanfromthenorth. Thanks for keeping an eye out for copyright violations. Your efforts are appreciated! I wanted to mention, though, that it isn't always necessary to tag them for speedy deletion. If only one section of an article has copyvio text -- but the rest of the article is fine (for example, has a infobox and introduction) -- than the copyvio text can simply be removed. That way, we get to keep a good article. As done with The Haunted Mask Lives! and Beyond the Valley of Thorns. If you are uncertain whether or not the text is a copyright violation and you want it to be reviewed by an administrator, than the section can be blanked using the procedure found at Copyright problems and the article can be submitted for copyright review there. Please feel free to ask if you have any questions. Cheers — Cactus Writer |   needles  01:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Sinclair Method issues
Hello, Dylan. I'm attempting to correct the issues that the Sinclair Method page was tagged with last month. Since the majority of those issues involve the page being one-sided, it is impossible for the person who wrote most of it (me) to make it less one sided. I wouldn't have written it that way in the first place if I'd thought it was biased.

As such, I'm asking the various people who participated in the review to help me identify which characteristics of the page need to be adjusted. Could you stop in and help? Robert Rapplean (talk) 16:01, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer Right Granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Helpful  One  12:03, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Roughtravelforararething.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Roughtravelforararething.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 22:55, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Please remain civil
Hi, You're a long-standing editor with a history of good edits and I've seen you around AfD quite a bit. I'm surprised, therefore, to have to remind you that edits such as this one aren't OK. Please keep a civil tongue in your head in the future. Cheers. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Excellent use of "fucking" as an adjectival emphatic, in my opinion. Better use of one's time would be to write stern notes to the people who brought this stub back for repeat AfD votes one and three months after a KEEP decision was rendered on the matter at AfD, actually. Call it gaming the system or cite WP:IDONTLIKEIT, but it smacks of bad faith and disruptive behavior. Compare and contrast to my potty mouth... Carrite (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Civility and community co-operation are a cornerstone of Wikipedia. You should know this. So please, be civil. Cheers. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 16:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Discussion extended back at Articles_for_deletion/Log/2010_September_15. Carrite (talk) 16:14, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Portuguese rock
It is not completely crap, although was quite ugly. I removed your prod and made some copyedits. The article shares a naming format with dozens of other similar articles, so it should be kept with its name and all its editing history. By the way, when you propose an article for deletion, please inform major editors, especially any newbies. If you must, send it to WP:AFD. Bearian (talk) 20:31, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you, very much, for your kind words during Articles for deletion/The Most Hated Family in America about my efforts to improve the quality of the article, The Most Hated Family in America. Much appreciated. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 10:21, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Alex Nackman / Article Deletion
DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2010

Dylan,

I created the Wiki page for singer/songriter/artist Alex Nackman back in 2006. I have just found out that has recently been deleted ion the last week, with your nomination leading the pack. I am really disappointed here. I've tried to follow all the Wiki rules and keep things as impartial and currently informative as possible. Alex Nackman is an established independent artist/musician from New York. He has toured over 700 shows worldwide and released 5 albums that are available almost everywhere and certainly online. He has also had roughly 40 songs placed on various television shows in the U.S. and UK, not to mention over 500,000 views at his myspace. Though he is not a major label artist or on the front cover of Rolling Stone, he has done enough where I think he deserves to have his Wiki page re-instated. I used to manage him and do not anymore, but I still help out and keep things current on the web for Alex and his management. I have never inflated his Wiki page with false or opinionated text. I have only provided the facts and some background bio information. If you just google his name, there are dozens of pages and information on Alex Nackman.

I truly hope you and the Wki team will help reconsider. There were other strong "keep" nominations for this article in previous discussions.

Thanks, Musicman5 (talk) 19:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC) Mark

reply to: mark@alexnackman.com


 * Although I was the one who nominated the Alex Nackman article for deletion its fate was decided by community consensus, as interpreted by the closing admin, User:Cirt. If you wish to have the article looked at again you can either leave a message on Cirts talkpage or take it up at a deletion review. The main concerns I had with the article were the question mark over his notability and the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources that were independent of the subject. If you aren't familiar with the standards we need at Wikipedia, then the guidelines to look at would be:- Music, Identifying reliable sources and Secondary_source. Cheers. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ski Roundtop
A tag has been placed on Ski Roundtop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Gr0ff (talk) 21:54, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Contact
How to we contact you without posting the issue online? admin@managersforum.org www.managersforum.org —Preceding unsigned comment added by NicholasFV (talk • contribs) 15:36, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Hotel Managers
September 24, 2010 5:55 PM EST

Dear Sir,

Please explain this to me; Wickipeida Page is : " Hotel Managers" We added the External Links to "Hotel Managers Forum" www.hotelmanagersforum.org with over 1800 members of mostly hotel managers.

You have deleted it with the claim that it is “spam”! Will you please be kind enough to explain WHY Hotel Managers Forum link (with over 1800 members) should not get linked from the Hotel Manager page of Wickipedia?

I am hoping this is just a misunderstanding. Let's fix the problem here before we continue to dispute resolution.

CC: admin@hotelmanagersforum.org --NicholasFV (talk) 21:57, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Enterprise Allowance Scheme
Hello! Your submission of Enterprise Allowance Scheme at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! January (Cassandra 73) talk 11:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Enterprise Allowance Scheme
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 00:03, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Bad Copy
I see no purpose in warning an editor if they're inactive. This editor has only made one edit in all of 2009, and their last edit before that was 2007. They ain't coming back. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 16:54, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Lizzie Cundy
As I went to school with this woman I definitely know her birthday. So you stop deletingmy comments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Public Concience (talk • contribs) 08:40, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your comment. Unfortunately, your edits about the date of birth for Lizzie Cundy keep getting reverted as they weren't sourced. Information in articles, particularly those on living people should have references that substantiate that information. Those references should be in reliable sources so that we know its accurate. It isn't enough to have been to school with a subject, as wikipedia editors aren't reliable sources. The reason for these rules is to try and maintain credibility for the encyclopedia. You can get more info on this in the WP:VERIFY, WP:VNT and WP:TRUTH guidelines, or if you need to know more reply on my talk page. Hope that helps. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 09:34, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: Martha Lipton
I've no problem with that at all. I just wanted to put some text in to show the article was notable. By all means, do what you need to do. Cheers! Redfarmer (talk) 11:42, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: Adoption
Hello, and thanks for your offer to "adopt" me. I've gone through tutorials and looked at other pages to see how they're put together, and I think I'm ready to officially start helping around here. I joined two Wikiprojects on topics I have interest and experience in, but I could use some advice on where to start. For example, which Typography To Do List items would you suggest for a newbie? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krystynheide (talk • contribs) 22:15, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Tears, Lies and Alibis
Please don't put reviews in the infobox as you did on Tears, Lies and Alibis. They're supposed to be integrated into the text. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:56, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

David G. Ludwig murders
I support your deletion request. Hopefully it will go through. Athene cunicularia (talk) 04:59, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * When will the powers that be decide whether this article will be deleted? Athene cunicularia (talk) 03:27, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK Nomination of Martha Lipton
Hi. I've nominated Martha Lipton, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Redfarmer (talk) 17:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Award of Good Fellowship

 * Thank you so much Dylan. Barrymore's early comedies are often ignored. Gene Fowler in Good Night Sweet Prince dismissed them as trivial. But Barrymore was a comedian as well as classic drama actor. He began his career in comedy and ended it there. An amusing story I think by Kotsilibas-Davis, has Barrymore working on one of these Famous Players, Long Island shot comedies and the director is James Kirkwood. The story goes that Barrymore is off somewhere in a bar on a binge and Kirkwood is looking for him so that they can finish the picture. Kirkwood eventually finds him and says something on the order "if you don't return with me to the set, I'll sling you over my shoulder and we'll go back together and complete the film". Too bad they're all gone. But thanks again.Koplimek (talk) 00:00, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Daniel Biss
Yes, I want to nominate it for deletion. It was deleted once after a rather contentious discussion. I don't see why go through the whole thing again. Mhym (talk) 16:23, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Martha Lipton
-- Cirt (talk) 06:03, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for The Incorrigible Dukane
-- Cirt (talk) 06:04, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Crocodiles Sleep Forever coverart hi-res.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Crocodiles Sleep Forever coverart hi-res.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello, i would certainly appreciate it if you have time to give me some feedback on the article i've drafted: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pczoll/rodolphehottinger. Rodolphe Hottinger represents the seventh generation of the Hotting(u)er family, most of whom have an article already in wikipedia. The Hottinger Chronology is also present. I don't believe, therefore, that there are issues of notability, but would still appreciate any constructive feedback to avoid dismissal. Many thanks!Pczoll (talk) 16:06, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!
LOL, thanks for pointing out my newfound "fame" at CityBeat! I'll try not to let it go to my head... 0;-D --MelanieN (talk) 06:12, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Timothy Snelgrove
Although I may not agree with your !vote at Articles for deletion/Timothy Snelgrove, I do appreciate a good turn of phrase, and I love how you worded your !vote. Thanks for making me smile. -- Whpq (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Politeness is a basic pillar of Wikipedia
A bit of advice from a vet, it's not a good idea to insult people even if you agree with them, or to respond with a request to be polite with a snide remark about the user's competence. Giving other volunteers a hard time does not help make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. If you are now chafing under the collar because you've just had your shortcommings pointed out to you, reflect that this is exactly how you have made others feel. We're here trying to make a better encyclopedia, some common courtesy and respect will make our time here more enjoyable for all of us. LK (talk) 10:44, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Apologies if I made you chafe under the collar when I pointed out the recommendations at WP:BEFORE. Not my intention, but you should review them before making any more AfDs. All the best. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 10:51, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Maine Cottage
Hey Dylan, can you please delete Maine Cottage? I'm the one who set it up in 2009 and now the company has gone bankrupt and closed. Someone posted recent Post & Courier articles about the closing of our stores with an unfounded claim that Maine Cottage essentially took the money and ran. The bank took over Maine Cottage. Maine Cottage lost everything. We only created the page for marketing purposes anyway. Please delete. Thanks.Cordie Southall (talk) 13:37, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Feel This
Found you some more reviews. Posted on the AFD. -208.81.148.194 (talk) 17:50, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Scream Pubs
I work at BaaBar across the road from Tarts and Robbos and my brother works at Tarts. Cant really source the information electronically however. Just common knowledge that I thought I could add. Rainingchamp345 (talk) 18:48, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Prod of leisure society
I'm at a loss trying to understand why you prodded leisure society with the rationale of unencyclopedic and unsourced, when a quick look at the literature reveals hundreds, perhaps thousands of sources on the subject, with more than 300 citing the paper used as a reference. It also makes no sense that the band, named after the concept, is now the target. Perhaps you could clarify this strange set of edits for me. Viriditas (talk) 08:41, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Mlcfeae
Hi. Thanks for closing this out. I tried to do so but didn't know how to do it properly. Now I can remove from my watchlist. (This nonsense should be SALTed, IMO).

Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 00:42, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

hey
hi!i am a part of wikiproject india under which i have to create few pages related to c functions in wikibooks.as you are interested in pages related to computers and are experienced i want you yo adopt me as a wikiuser.waiting for ur reply!divya crazy 27 07:07, 10 October 2011 (UTC)(talk)

RFA thankspam
Thank you for your support at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. Best,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:33, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

AfD
There is an AfD discussion here that you may be interested in. Eric444 (talk) 22:52, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Roddie Clark
The creation of the article then immediate AFD (which I have blocked him for) seems to be part of a campaign of gamesmanship/disruption by PorridgeGobbler. See ANI. I suspect that if it is deleted and someone recreates it (possibly with more content), he will attempt to argue CSD G4. Do you object if I remove the speedy tag? Superm401 - Talk 00:03, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * G4 wouldn't apply: it would have been deleted via speedy, not technically as a result of a deletion discussion. Also, if someone comes up with another article with more references and proper content, it wouldn't be a recreation; as I understand it, the content has to be quite close to how it was in the original article in order to be thought of as 'recreation'. His arguments (should they even arise) wouldn't stand up, and he'd be liable to accusations of disruption again. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 00:07, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You're right. I forgot that G4 doesn't cover speedy. Superm401 - Talk 00:14, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Rollbacker
Hi. I've been looking over your contributions and you certainly seem to do good work here. I've gone ahead and issued you rollback rights. Please be careful with the privilege - it can be easily lost. I recommend you carefully read up on the what you should do and should not do with rollback, then practice here before using it. I'm confident you'll use it wisely. If for some reason you don't want it, let me know and I'll revert.

You may wish to display on your user page. Happy editing. Toddst1 (talk) 18:48, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Ray Siderius
When you take Ray Siderius to AFD, please tell me so I can vote to delete. Bgwhite (talk) 23:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * btw, you should not have declined the speedy deletion. It doesn't get delete if an editor contests the speedy.  It should be left to an admin on weather to delete or keep. Bgwhite (talk) 23:36, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Asperity Employee Benefits article
Thanks for categorising this article Dylan, I'm new so just getting the hang of things. S Sandra.anderson.brighton (talk) 23:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited 2012 BRIT Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Record (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Best Albums of the Noughties (2000–2010)
Hi Dylanfromthenorth. I knew "Best Albums of the Noughties (2000–2010)" was iffy and I'm actually relieved to see it deleted. Thanks for the courteous tone of your contribution to the debate. Stananson (talk) 19:48, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Adopt-a-user
Hi Dylanfromthenorth. I'm leaving you this message because you have previously been involved as an adopter with Wikipedia's Adopt-a-user program. A clean-up of this program is currently underway, and as part of the process I am trying to find out who is and isn't still interested in remaining an adopter.

If you would prefer not to be part of the adoption program anymore, you need do nothing; when the overhaul of the project is completed your name will be removed from the list of active adopters. However, if you have current adoptees, an active adoption school or an interest in adopting in the near future, then please let us know by signing here.

If you want to remain in the project and can currently take on more adoptees, there is a serious backlog at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user; it would be enormously helpful if you could take on one or two of the users there. Please do keep an eye on the project for upcoming changes, we could use your opinions and your help! Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 09:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Esperanto music
I have proposed merging the article Esperanto music with the article Esperanto culture. You participated in a discussion of  a proposal to delete the Esperanto music article earlier this year. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Naŋar (talk) 13:33, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Venky's, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Favorite Chicken
Hello, just letting you know I removed the prod from the above article as it has previously been proposed for deletion. Thank you. Rotten regard      Softnow  20:08, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

JamesBWatson (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mobile agency
Hi. Articles in the Articles for creation project sit in Wikipedia talk space for technical reasons, so unregistered IP users can create them. Therefore they do not belong to any parent article, and so you cannot tag them for WP:CSD. You can CSD other AfC articles, but this one does fit any of the criteria at first glance. -- Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)   15:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mos annual2005.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Mos annual2005.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Leisure society
Hi. In May 2011, you prodded Leisure society. In your rationale you stated: "Doesn't appear to be an encyclopedic topic. Article consists of synthesis and original research (such that it is), with no references to back it up." That's a bit odd, since the diff clearly lists two books (Dumazedier, 1967; Seabrook, 1988) and a third working paper with an external link that contains a bibliography of more than 50 notable sources about the concept. It even says "extensive bibliography" in the article. So, I'm really confused how you could prod this article with this rationale. Viriditas (talk) 09:41, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

The Wales Coast Path WikiProject
Diolch!

Llywelyn2000 (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Request for comment
Hello, I'm here onbehalf of WP:ORPHAN in which you are also a participant. So, we want your opinion to a WP:ORPHAN related matter. It is a proposal by. Please have a look here. Your opinion (i.e support, oppose etc) are very much appreciated there. Thank you. By Jim Cartar through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Backlog drive
 Hello  Dylanfromthenorth ,

WikiProject Orphanage is holding a  month long Backlog Elimination Drive to de-orphan articles which have orphan tags!

The goal is to eliminate the backlog of orphan articles. There are currently 0 articles which have orphan tags. The drive is running from April 12, 2014 to May 12, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all editors participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. To add your name in the participants list click here.

So start de-orphaning articles! Click here to see the list of articles need de-orphaning. Visit Suggestions for how to de-orphan an article to know more! Thanks. Opt-out Instructions by on behalf of WikiProject Orphanage through   MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Interview for The Signpost

 * This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Orphanage

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Orphanage for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (indicate)  @ 18:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Speed Deletion
Therefore, they have released my created page for deletion I would now like to explain why it is important to give this person a Wikipedia page here. There is much interest in him and there are certainly people who like to more about this information would inform him at least the most important I have listed on Wikipedia. I have all kinds of relevances fulfilled as I have seen so there is no reason this person no Wikipedia page to enter. I call here's an example, namely the Wikipedia page of "Adrian von Ziegler" is constructed exactly like that of me. Both composers have become YouTube by "Famous". Usertalk:Demise21 06:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Demise. I based my speedy deletion request for Sadžid Husić on an unsuccessful search for sources. Wikipedia has quite strict guidelines on who is eligible for a Wikipedia article, and the minimum requirement is that they have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sourcesthat are independent of the subject. If you have some available, great, but they'll need to be attached to the article. I included some links on your talkpage that provide more information on all this :-) Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 07:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)


 * He You just said that I have created this page about myself so what is wrong. As I have already mentioned above, the sides of me and the same, there are of "Adrian von Ziegler" no difference between the two the relevance criteria of "Adrian von Ziegler" are even worse than me.Please note that there is a person here is in it also goes to a Public Interest.I think we should at least give the person a Wikipedia page by the people can inform themselves need the information. I have also listed above the same if someone even more relevant is left like they can import. Usertalk:Demise21 07:27, 19 November 2014
 * Oops, yeah, I used the wrong template, you can ignore that I said you created an article about yourself ;-)
 * I'm not familiar with the Adrian von Ziegler article, and in any case the fact that one thing has an article doesn't mean another thing should; see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for more on that. The main thing is for you to add sources to the article, that's the main hurdle to get over. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 07:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Can pass no problem as I said I have since also added links to the relevant Wikipedia page which lead to relenvate pages.It's just a matter that I am one of the persons of interest it has more information about him so to get the composer (am a fan of him) unfortunately I have to realize that it article is here almost or did not get the relevance criteria after.I have it here on my articles I have written some referred to the statements about the person something.As I said above I have on the page above added the other that can also deal with his person the other links be added.Maybe I do not have many links packed into it but i think that could change if the products are the remains soon as there are certainly many people are still working on this article.Usertalk:Demise21 07:51, 19 November 2014
 * Yeah the links that are in the article right now aren't up to the standard I'm afraid - see WP:SOURCES for the kind of thing needed; they have to be independent of the subject (so, not things like Facebook); in-depth (so, brief mentions aren't good enough), and from reliable sources (so, newspapers and books etc, not blogs or Twitter). Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:10, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The Facebook I understand that we can remove all the stuff're only 2 things and since it came on the information. But iTunes does so as a German media journal which publishes an article about him but should be relevant enough I think. The Dusseldorf Evening Gazette is not a blog, so this should be valid as relevance. CDBaby and a website where you can buy the music of him I think you can accept as the relevance least shows that he offers his music on the Internet for sale.Usertalk:Demise21 08:20, 19 November 2014
 * The only one of the links currently on the page that is acceptable is the Dusseldorf Evening Gazette one - you need more like that, from different sources. Just having music on the internet for sale doesn't show notability; neither does having a YouTube channel. Even I've got both of those and I shouldn't have a Wikipedia article either! Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:34, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok then give me some time and I will find more links. That should not be a problem, I see my mistake a I did something wrong in the relevance criteria and I will immediately mending I need just a little time for the I still find more articles.Usertalk:Demise21 08:38, 19 November 2014
 * If you intend to add more references, go to the page and click 'Contest this speedy deletion'; I can't remove the template once it's up there. Have a read of WP:BLP and WP:RELIABLE for guidance on adding info to the article. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:48, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * So I have now added more products myself have looked again if the relenvanz it is sufficient that she does.I certainly hope that I have thus met the relevance criteria for the page so that it gets released.I will of course personally about the ever more relevant articles are added worry soon as I find something.But I'm going to give me trouble.Usertalk:Demise21 09:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

You met a sock of RealMadridCF2012. All the "sources" are created by himself. See Sadzid Husic. --Yoda1893 (talk) 23:22, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

WP:EVADE
I'd like to point out that banned and blocked users do not need to have a completed SPI to remove the comment itself []. I plan on reverting you in a little bit provided you don't have a reason to believe that I'm wrong in my assessment. The behaviors and language is the same as previous socks and as I mentioned at the SPI the only reason I filed the SPU was to check and make sure we didn't have a new farm growing. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 03:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The SPI is closed with no further action to be taken, they said themselves that it could just as likely be a result of canvassing, or a meat. Closing admins aren't dumb, they'll take into account that it's an SPA, whatever the reason for it being an SPA is. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 04:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't think they are stupid but the meatpuppetry policy also explicitly deals with it [] where it states that in cases of doubt to treat them the same way as per the finding of this arbcom case []. That's two seperate cases, I am waiting on a clarifying comment but it is still my intention to revert it when I have that comment based off of WP:EVADE. Sorry but my good faith for this person completely left when they tried saying I have ties to the KKK. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 04:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I had the clarification I needed and it was that it was ok to remove it, before I do that I want to ask, do you have any reason to believe it's not a sock or was this just AGF? Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Neither really. I'm sure it's someone who's up to some flavour of no good, but thought it would be better to leave the comment up and let the closing admin decide its validity, while still giving them the info. I'm not particularly attached to the comment though, and (deliberately) don't involve myself in too much sockpuppetry stuff (life's stressful enough!), so feel free to re-remove it if that's what the protocol is. :-) Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 14:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok thank you, I am fairly involved with the sock puppet investigation side of things as I do new page patrol and they seem to pop up often there. I just wanted to make sure so I didn't dig myself or anyone else a hole we don't need to fill lol. Cheers. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

FYI mentioned your comments
FYI mentioned your comments at Sockpuppet investigations/Bambolinaz, please feel free to participate there. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 07:26, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 12 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Seven dirty words page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=637787173 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F637787173%7CSeven dirty words%5D%5D Ask for help])

deOrphaning script
Hello everyone! I was just working on responding to a couple bug reports for a script that I worked up as part of a request from this project, and I noticed that only a couple people (who weren't even on this mailing list) are actually using the script. A little history on the script: In March of 2014, came to my user talk page and said he needed some help in acquiring a script for a backlog drive that he was working on that could keep track of and score deOrphanings for a scored backlog drive. I took that request to the project's talk page (BackLog Drive "DO" (De-Orphaning) script proposal) and there was near unanimous support for this. I thought about the proposal and decided the best way to do it was to build a new script (which is still no where near as comprehensive as 's OrphanTabs) and build into it a mechanism that will make BLD scoring easy.

What I'm wondering at this point is, since there appears to be only two people using the script, should I continue to develop this script with a goal of using it for scoring BLDs or just debug the existing script and leave it at that. Thanks for any replies or comments.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
 * This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of —  14:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LenkaAlbumCover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:LenkaAlbumCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gorilla manor.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Gorilla manor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Dylanfromthenorth: Enjoy the holiday season and upcoming winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America1000 23:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Reference errors on 20 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Sharleen Spiteri discography page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=700721705 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F700721705%7CSharleen Spiteri discography%5D%5D Ask for help])

January 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=700982795 your edit] to McFly may have broken the syntax by modifying 5 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:10, 21 January 2016 (UTC)