User talk:Dylanhall2/sandbox

Article Evaluation

Byzatine -Sasanian War of 602-628'''

-This article does an excellent job of providing a lot of information about the topic.

-The problem i noticed with this article was it was a bit disorganized. At the beginning of the article, the authors give a small summary about the topic, but then the authors start to backtrack and talk about the background of the war, then proceeds to go into the beginning of the conflict, then Heraclius's Rebellion, then jumps into Persian ascendancy and so on.

-Someone that does not know much about this topic may find this topic difficult to understand.

-The last time the article was edited was on February 13th, 2019. This is good for the simple fact that it is up to date and the editor/ editors have reviewed the content that was already provided.

- I checked out a couple of sources the authors referenced, and they were legit sources. One source was from a book written by an author who graduated from Princeton University. Another source i checked out was a book written by George T. Dennis. I did some research on this author, and he is an Emeritus Professor of History at the Catholic Universit of America. In my opinion, these sources are credible.

-Sources and article are neutral.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine–Sasanian_War_of_602–628


 * Good assessment. I like that you looked up some of the sources. One note: it's standard for wikipedia articles to have an 'intro' where they highlight everything, then go into more detail in clear sections. Is this what they were doing in this article? Christinedbaker (talk) 20:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)