User talk:Dymo400

Had other account
I forgot password on other account and had to start anew.. Not happy. But oh well wiki goes on.

Hey everyone let me know whats up on this page. While I did have other wiki account I still am fairly new and if I do anything wrong or against wiki rules please tell me and I will not do ot again.

Take care and have a great weekend.--Dymo400 (talk) 10:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Michael Raphael
I understand you have an issue with this article, and that's fine (I don't know who Michael Raphael is and I don't particularly care) but do not remove information from an article that can help others judge its worth in the AFD - you have stated that you believe the info is false; now leave it up there so others can confirm. It will also help others judge whether Google sources are about this Michael Raphael in particular, because there are a few (I think leaving the claims will help your side with this). Regards, Somno (talk) 12:25, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Thats fine I did not know if you were sticking by that request and thats cool.--Dymo400 (talk) 12:53, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Somno I get your point but please leave out his web site as it points to disney logos that is just bogus while asking parents of unsuspecting singers to hire him for productions of songs is just wrong. I left the remainder up and simply removed the web url that is clearly self promotion. Let me know if thats OK?--Dymo400 (talk) 12:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't mind if the website is removed; just that some of the other "facts" remain - e.g. by leaving in "he has worked with Mitchel Musso from Hannah Montana", it's easier for people to look that up and find no proof of it. Also, please rewrite your statement ASAP at the AFD to remove the allegation that he "Exagerated his BIO and fabricates his web site" per the WP:biographies of living persons policy, or I will have to remove that part of it. Thanks, Somno (talk) 05:56, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Somo how the rewording to you of "appears to have fabricated" does that satisfy the policy? Let me know how you feel about that, thanks--Dymo400 (talk) 06:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

AFD
I changed my !vote to merge. Iowateen (talk) 06:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:FREE use picture in public domain official public Campaign photo of Candidate Darrin E McGillis.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FREE use picture in public domain official public Campaign photo of Candidate Darrin E McGillis.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:38, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:FREE use picture in public domain official public Campaign photo of Candidate Darrin E McGillis.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FREE use picture in public domain official public Campaign photo of Candidate Darrin E McGillis.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ww2censor (talk) 14:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

McGillis granted FREE USE World Wide
Candidate Darrin McGillis granted full world wide free use to the world for this photo the Campaign email address is mcgillis4governor@gmail.com for confirmation. The Campaign web site is http://www.mcgillis4governor.com the picture is also in the public domain in newspapers, state of florida elections department web site etc. --Dymo400 (talk) 08:53, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Darrin McGillis


The article Darrin McGillis has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Appears not to meet notability guidelines. Certainly does not meet WP:POLITICIAN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lincolnite (talk) 18:11, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Darrin McGillis
I have nominated Darrin McGillis, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Darrin McGillis. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Lincolnite (talk) 08:40, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darrin McGillis. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Nsk92 (talk) 09:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note. Because I was not the sole creator of the Darrin McGillis page I felt that those who participated in the final creation of the page should be notified of the Afd why I was the only one notified I have no clue. I simply provided the following message identical on each alerting them of the Afd and nothing else: "Way back when we both created the Darrin McGillis page and now due to politics the page is on its way to being deleted. Why dont you chime in if you have a minute. Thanks" I wish we could get away from this fifth grader back and forth and want appears to be mean conduct towards my person I feel like a punching bag and I am not.--Dymo400 (talk) 13:32, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: That is WP:CANVASS and you could be blocked for that. Toddst1 (talk) 14:26, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I have nothing to do with this article, I simply found this discussion following another. IMHO, This notice does not appear to be "written to influence the outcome rather than to improve the quality of a discussion" as stated in the WP:CANVASS. It does come across as frustrated, but no where does the user violate the guidlines of "cross-pointing "friendly notices" ". I also seem to me that a culture that fosters improvement and openess does not exist when good faith contributors are prevented from participation due in large part to a lack of knowledge of the procedings. Not every contributor is able to check on every article they have contributed to to see if there is an issue, a large portion of contributors are not full time wikipedians able to watch things like a hawk. It has been my personal observation in life that there exist two main thought groups in this type of instance, I call them : 1> "No! you can't do that." and 2> "Here, why don't you try this instead.", The first fosters an environment of Conflict and Confrontation whereas the second fosters an Open ended Cooperative workplace for all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.187.174 (talk) 14:34, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

AN/I notification
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nsk92 (talk) 14:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)