User talk:Dyothelite

Speedy deletion of Christopher Ericson Etter
A tag has been placed on Christopher Ericson Etter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:40, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Both the above article and Dyothelemic Christianity have been deleted. Christopher Ericson Etter's only publication is a vanity press book, which does not make him notable. The concept is expounded only in that book, and therefore is also not notable. Feel free to contribute to Wikipedia on notable subjects. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Qualitative Non-Pluralism
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Qualitative Non-Pluralism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?  TN ‑ X - Man  18:41, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ''Wikipedia is not a place tp promote yourself, your books, and your concepts. Do so again and you will be banned permanently.'' - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Qualitative Non-Pluralism
A tag has been placed on Qualitative Non-Pluralism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:55, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * All of your self-promotional articles have now been deleted. Every edit you make is now under scrutiny by other Wikipedia editors. If you attempt to recreate these articles, or create other that are self-promoting, you will be banned immediately. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)