User talk:Dz.research

Regarding your edits to Rory Cellan-Jones
Your recent edits to Rory Cellan-Jones have been removed. If you had properly read the blog which you referred to (stopnujboycott.blogspot.com) you would have seen that Cellan-Jones' and Shankleman's campaign is AGAINST the NUJs' boycott of Israel (which has been in place for some time), not in support of it as you allege. You appear to have an understanding of the situation which is 180o from the true facts. Your edits are in violation of Wikipedia's Biographies of Living People policy which requires accuracy in all statements about living people. Please be more careful in future edits, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Arwel (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

August 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Szczekociny, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if I neglected to name the article in this post. Thank you. AngelOfSadness talk  15:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I have to remind you that adding content to wikipedia without a known source available is considered original research which isn't allowed even if the claims are true. Without the addition of good source, I'm afraid the information can't be included. I can't do anything with the sources you provided as the first one was about something else entirely(i.e will not back up the claims) and the second was in hebrew. Unfortunately this means I can't revert the edit as there's no source stating the claims. All I can say is keep searching the internet for a source which 1. says exactly what you want to put in the article, and 2. is in english. If you are not sure about the link WP:External links should help you to decide if the link is appropriate for the article. If you have any further questions, post a message on my talk page-- AngelOfSadness talk  16:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Lewandowski Familie und Angestellte.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:Lewandowski Familie und Angestellte.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Lewandowski Familie und Angestellte.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:Lewandowski Familie und Angestellte.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Lewandowski Familie und Angestellte.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:Lewandowski Familie und Angestellte.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)