User talk:Dzd~enwiki

Pittsburgh Climate
I have reverted your edits to the Pittsburgh article. The passage you edited has been the subject of discussion and consensus building, please read the discussion on article talk. You should also not remove chunks of referenced content from an article without explanation as it will likely be considered vandalism, and please don't forget to include an edit summary with your edits. Thanks. Mfield (talk) 02:55, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ''The section you are editing has been the subject of lengthy discussion and consensus building. You need to join that discussion and set down why you believe it should be changed, not simply change it.'' Mfield (talk) 03:22, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Pittsburgh Climate
I ask you once again to join the discussion at Talk:Pittsburgh or refrain from editing the article. Wikipedia is built around principles of consensus and reliable sources. The single source you quote does not appear to be as reliable a source of data as the multiple sources that have been used in the formation of consensus on the question of Pittsburgh's climate classification. If you think you can persuade the multiple established editors that have discussed this already then please do so. If you can create a new consensus then all good. At this point your continued changing of the outcome of the previous discussion without engagement can ony be considered an act of bad faith on your part. It also feels like you are being disruptive to make a point. Mfield (talk) 21:08, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Mfield (talk) 21:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Dzd. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Dzd~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 12:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)