User talk:Dzmzh

Your submission at Articles for creation: Picnic (online supermarket) has been accepted
 Picnic (online supermarket), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Primefac (talk) 16:22, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Picnic_(online_supermarket) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.


 * Why did you decide to chop off 20,000 bytes from your draft? ! dave  13:09, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I concur. It's a decent page, it should be in the Article space. I have to say, this is the first time I've ever seen a creator oppose a draft acceptance! Primefac (talk) 13:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm very sorry for doing so, but please-please-please with a cheese on a cracker, could you kill this page or move it to drafts or whatever. Something that shouldn't have been done was done and there are no excuses for that.--Dzmzh
 * Um, okay., G7-able? ! dave  13:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * You're going to have to be more specific - what do you mean "something that shouldn't have been done"?
 * dave, I'd like to hear the reason first. Primefac (talk) 13:27, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a page of a company I work for, I wrote it with my best intentions and published without letting anyone know. As a result, it caused a serious shit storm and it's basically either this page or me now, no matter how stupid this might sound.--Dzmzh
 * When you wrote the article, you agreed to release your contributions under the CC BY-SA 3.0 license and GFDL. I'm sorry if this got you into trouble at work, but that is not a valid reason for deletion.--Atlan (talk) 15:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Let Wikipedia live long and prosper then.--Dzmzh
 * It occurs to me that a potential way that it could be deleted is if Dzmzh's employment assigns copyright of their work related to the company to the company, meaning they have no right to grant a license to Wikipedia (but IANAL). Perhaps? —&#123;&#123;u&#124;Goldenshimmer&#125;&#125;｜✝️｜they/their｜😹｜T/C｜☮️｜John 15:12｜🍂 17:03, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * , WP:G7 is a perfectly acceptable reason for deleting the page provided the author is the only significant contributor. This is the case, so I'll delete the page. Primefac (talk) 17:17, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for helping me out. I'm terribly sorry for all this mess.--Dzmzh

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Strange_behaviour_by_Dzmzh. ! dave 13:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Picnic online supermarket logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Picnic online supermarket logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 10 December 2017 (UTC)