User talk:E-historyprospect

Welcome
Hi E-historyprospect. Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed your edits to City of Prospect. I note that you've added quite a bit of historical information which was really needed. Thanks! I also noticed that you removed existing text that included citations without any more explanation than "doubling up". It's probably also a good idea to add some information on the article talk page if it's too much to explain via your edit summary. Please don't remove cited information without more explanation than that, unless it's grossly incorrect or inappropriate. If you're not familiar with Wikipedia guidelines and policy, here are some key ones to keep in mind: Cheers, Donama (talk) 23:27, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) WP:NPOV - Keep a neutral point of view;
 * 2) WP:VERIFIABLE - Anything you add to an article should be verifiable with published secondary or tertiary sources (especially opinions); raw facts should be verifiable via those too but primary sources are ok; and
 * 3) WP:CT - Citation templates, specifically , which are super useful for consistent formatting of footnote references.
 * Hi again. Please also read WP:COPYVIO - All about copyright violations. You need to be aware that copying and pasting text from any source without clearly putting it in a quotation (as you did in the City of Prospect article) is a copyright violation and stricly not allowed on Wikipedia. It's also illegal. There's some advice on how to place chunks of text in blockquotes where it's not easy to summarise or rewrite in different words. See WP:QUOTE - Manual of Style: Quotations. Cheers Donama (talk) 01:41, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Architecture of Adelaide concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Architecture of Adelaide, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Architecture of Adelaide


Hello, E-historyprospect. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Architecture of Adelaide".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC)