User talk:E.G.

Titanic (1989 film)
I've added the "prod" template to the article Titanic (1989 film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Titanic (1989 film). You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. All the best, Madder 19:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Request to move article State of War incomplete
You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page State of War to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:


 * 1) Added    at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article.  This creates the required template for you there.
 * 2) Added a place for discussion at the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved. This can easily be accomplished by adding  NewName  to the bottom of the page, which will automatically create a discussion section there.
 * 3) Added  PageName  to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 17:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, I see that the move has already been handled, so I think no more guidance is necessary. I should of course have gone through all these steps. E.G. (talk) 04:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Block
Since you're already blocked on svwp I don't really see the point but rules are rules. I've asked for a block on your account here on enwp as well as the one already in place on svwp. GameOn (talk) 12:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011

 * Based on strong evidence at Swedish Wikipedia and verification that some of the confirmed accounts have been used here to violate multiple account practices, this account has been indefinitely blocked. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC)