User talk:E20Ci

Welcome!
Howdy,, Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions goto Help or the FAQ, if you can't find your answer there check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page. ---

Additional tips
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
 * For Wikipedia policies and guidelines see The Five Pillars of Wikipedia and What Wikipedia is not.
 * Find everything in the Directory.
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * Introduce yourself at the new user log.
 * If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
 * If you have edits from before creating an account try this.
 * To Upload Images with the correct Copyright tags.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;), this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Be Bold!!
You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round. Jo e  I  08:00, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:2006_American_Buffalo_Proof_Reverse.jpg
Needs sourcing. Can you add where you got this image to the information on it? Some bot is going to see it has no sourcing info and mark it for deletion. Give the website or whatever where you found it and WHY it's in the PD.. thanks! This is important as it is about to be on the main page!  + +Lar: t/c 11:57, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Your article, American Buffalo (Coin), was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions!  + +Lar: t/c 12:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Price of Buffalo Coin
I understand that you perhaps feel you "own" the Buffalo Coin article since you wrote it, but the price is NOT based on the spot price of gold and a small premium. The mint has announed a fixed price of $800. Spot on gold is under $600. -- Cecropia 18:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Fotolia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 06:04, 29 April 2007 (UTC)


 * You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review.  JuJube 13:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  JuJube 13:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Good faith editing ... or spam?
I have been taking you on good faith when you wrote that you recreated the Fotolia article because you were surprised Wikipedia lacked an article on this company. Then I saw that you added a referral code to the URL for the company's web site: --A. B. (talk) 03:54, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Before: http://www.fotolia.com
 * 2) After your edit: http://www.fotolia.com/partner/318516

fotolia.com/partner/318516 spam on Wikipedia
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.


 * fotolia.com: Linksearch • Linkreport • COIBot Linkreport • Eagle's spam report search • Eagle's interwiki link search • Wikipedia search • Google search • Google search Veinor pages

Since my polite note last month, you've continued, using anonymous IP addresses in South Florida:
 * User: ( talk • contribs • [/wiki/Special:Log/move?user=  page moves  ] • block user  • [  block log  ] )
 * User: ( talk • contribs • [/wiki/Special:Log/move?user=  page moves  ] • block user  • [  block log  ] )

Please stop. --A. B. (talk) 21:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for Image:Lincoln Memorial Interior Panoramic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lincoln Memorial Interior Panoramic.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 01:11, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Unconquered at Doak Campbell Stadium.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Unconquered at Doak Campbell Stadium.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 21:17, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Fotolia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fotolia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fotolia& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  18:00, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Lightning Over Cape Canaveral Air Force Station.jpg


The file File:Lightning Over Cape Canaveral Air Force Station.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Azamat Bagatov


The article Azamat Bagatov has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Azamat Bagatov for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Azamat Bagatov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Azamat Bagatov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)