User talk:E2eamon/archive 1

Bobby Orr Article
I fixed a typo in the article. Someone wrote "believed" where they meant to say "belied", as in "It is belied, however, by Eagleson's public disclosure of the Bruins' ownership offer". This keeps on getting flagged as vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.17.73 (talk) 06:27, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: Help
If I understand you correctly, I think you are asking what the green or red numbers on each edit represents. The number signifies the size of the items editors add to or remove from a particular article. Green means addition and red means removal. The larger the number, the more things get added to or removed from articles. Does that make sense?— Chris! c / t 01:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hello E2eamon, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead, use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 21:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JFKMedicalCenterLogo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:JFKMedicalCenterLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 00:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Re:Rollback
-  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 02:03, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: Vandalism
Well, I am not an administrator, so there isn't much I can do about those vandalism. But if you need assistance, you can report to Administrator intervention against vandalism. An admin will take care of things.— Chris! c / t 18:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 05:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

CSD error
I marked this page for csd- I didn't create it. Please notify the author, not me. Thanks. E2eamon (talk) 15:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you were using twinkle, and it messed up. I understand.  Please, though, could you remove the warning from my talk page? Thanks.  E2eamon (talk) 15:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, sorry, looks like Twinkle got it wrong. I think we both tried to mark it CSD at the same time, and Twinkle got an "out by one" error, as it does sometimes. Happy to remove the warning, which is now gone. Best regards -- Boing!   said Zebedee  16:41, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Re:vandalism warnings
-  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 02:39, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Congrats
Hi, I've seen your dedication to keeping Wikipedia free of vandalism. If you like, you can put this on your user page. It's a personal project of mine. Deagle_AP (talk) 14:38, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Account Creation Interface
I registered for an account on the account creation interface site, and would like to join. E2eamon (talk) 01:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Rehydroxylation dating
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Left a brief note at Editor review/e2eamon (2).  • ɔ   ʃ   →  05:02, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Free licenses
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Free licenses, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. E♴ (talk) 21:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Exactly what is that? You gave no reason reverting me. See the talk page. Also, when you write on someone's talk page, be kind enough to create a new section. It was difficult for me to find your message. Taric25 (talk) 22:09, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. I saw "Do What The Fuck You Want", and assumed it was vandalism.  I realize now that it was not.  Thanks for pointing out my mistake.  E♴ (talk) 00:13, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 17:03, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Xeros Ltd.
I have nominated Xeros Ltd., an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Xeros Ltd.. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 00:36, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

WP:ORE invite
I joined- thanks for the invite!--E♴ (talk) 04:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Xeros logo.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Xeros logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

comment on an edit from this IP address
Ya man that's a completely stupid edit and honestly I don't know where it came from. No one in my family would've done that and I have a registered account of my own user:saksjn. Maybe our neighbor was stealing our wi fi... who knows.... I'll watch the IP address and see if it becomes a problem. This is saksjn not logged in. 98.85.32.109 (talk) 05:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

RfA thanks spam


Hello E2eamon, thank you for supporting my RfA! I was promoted with a final tally of 65/4/3. I hope I can live up to everyone's expectations, do my best for Wikipedia, and take to heart the constructive criticism. Always feel free to message me if I'm around. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:21, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: 'Editor Review: User:Petiatil'
Thank you so much, not many (nobody except you) have commented on my request. I am greatful for your input and definately did not take offense. I do believe that in order to place a RFA I would need to do more content edits, which I believe you commented on. I did create one article years ago Verizon SmartPark if it still exsists, however I was a newby then. Honestly, I don't know what i would be particularly interested in contributing to. Anyways, thank you again for your input and again no offense taken. Cheers! petiatil &raquo;User &raquo;Contribs 05:09, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Also:
Heh, i really think that your wiki signature is interesting, using the block or 'unknown character' as a 'd' in your signature. Creative!. Hope to hear from you again you seem like a good person. Except of course you're blanking pages with "bahahahahahh!!H!H!Hasjklhasldjkaghs" then i might be a little reluctant to befriend you. Cheers. Petiatil&raquo;Talk 21:36, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * (The same reply I put on your talk): Ha- You must not have all the fonts installed. Since my username is e2eamon, the "box" is actually a recycling symbol with a 2 inside of it. (See the pic)  [[Image:U+2674 DejaVu Sans.svg|50px|&#x2674;]] It's the symbol for High density polyethylene.  I wonder how many people can't see it.  It works fine on my computer...--E♴ (talk) 00:58, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for 1973 shooting in South Jamaica, Queens
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 12:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Shutting Down An Apparent Vandal
In terms of your comments to User:99.251.204.71 in relation to the vandalism of the Skip Spence page, I am wondering if it is time to shut this IP address down, given three incidents of apparent vandalism. I don't know how this is done. He or she obviously has such a big life, but still...

My recollection is that this is the same person, with the same big life, who was getting such a thrill out of inventing band names and placing them on Birdman Records, waiting to see how long they would remain up before being removed.

Dreadarthur (talk) 05:49, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

I was not doing test edits
The thing is the guy kept on removing the speedy deltion without doing anything else. That is all I did.

Kamkek (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I see that now. I originally saw that you had changed "becoming" to read "becomBold texting".  This made it look like a test edit.  --E♴ (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

WTI vs Brent
I was not constructive, but it should be the original poster's responsibility to clarify what crude they were talking about. Did you send them a note too? Nobody in Europe knows what WTI is. That person found a loose article somewhere and just quoted it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.42.133.227 (talk) 01:53, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of PERISCOP
Hello! Your submission of PERISCOP at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nyttend (talk) 23:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for PERISCOP
Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

New Oregon community articles
I appreciate your work in creating all these new articles about Oregon communities, but I'm not really sure all of them really are actual unincorporated communities, or really even places that anyone would recognize or use to describe the area. It looks like you are using hometownlocator.com alone as a reference; I don't know where all that data comes from, but I think it's somehow coordinated with the post office and may not correspond to reality beyond that.

May I suggest that you ensure that the communities have at least one other reference to prove their identity, and that they be categories correctly? For example, Mayville and Mayger do seem to have once existed, but should now be categorized as ghost towns, or former settlements. You may wish to recategorize these as former populated places, or ghost towns. There are a couple of other types of categories; see the subcategories under Category:Populated places in Oregon.

Then there are some that I'm pretty sure don't exist, or never existed; places like Newport Heights and New Idanha I'm pretty sure don't really exist.

Let me know what you think. --Esprqii (talk) 23:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

(Oh, and go ahead and reply here--I'll watch the page for a while. Also I opened a discussion over on the WikiProject Oregon talk page.)

Do you think this would do?--E♴ (talk) 00:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I think those are drawing all from the same place. I'm not disputing that the place exists--just that I don't think all of them are "unincorporated communities." I'd like to see some reliable source that refers to it in some actual community context other than pulling it from the GNIS or other website. I think that would make it a stronger article. --Esprqii (talk) 05:10, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi E2eamon— has said here that GNIS is the source these articles should be switching to, and I've been gradually been making my way down the list of these unincorporated communities, using Oregon Geographic Names to expand. I'd like to know if you wish to help. Currently I've gotten through Locust Grove, Oregon. Thanks! Jsayre64  (talk)  04:48, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

--Jsayre64 (talk)  01:55, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK hooks
Hello, E2eamon. Thank you for helping out at DYK. Please note that [1] when moving hooks from T:TDYK to the prep areas, you need to move the credit templates as well, and [2] the Batman hooks are meant for April Fools' Day. (You might want to read the whole discussion. It's near the beginning.)  Hope this helps. --PFHLai (talk) 05:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I would suggest holding it on T:TDYK for now. --PFHLai (talk) 05:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * You're right. Just confirmed with the author that it's okay to use it now.  Let's keep it on P1. --PFHLai (talk) 05:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

User talk:74.240.68.37
My friend, please allow me the opportunity to do the user warnings for my own reversions. Thanks! &mdash;Elipongo (Talk contribs) 05:03, 1 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry, that was an accident. I clicked on the rollback link, and as that page was loading, on the warning link.  I didn't get the message that you had beat me too it until after I had already warned the vandal.  I guess I shouldn't warn until I rollback but my computer is being slow lately :( --E♴ (talk) 05:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)


 * It's okay - I just never fail to get annoyed at edit conflicts - a failing of mine, sorry. The editor was given a polite correction by someone and that's what should matter, not who issued it. Happy editing! &mdash;Elipongo (Talk contribs) 05:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Moy Salinas
I have closed Articles for deletion/Moy Salinas and redirected the article to Moises Salinas, as it appears the two articles are about the same person. I will also be requesting revision deletion of the libelous content, and have warned the editor who added it. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 16:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * FYI that request for RevDel is here. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 16:13, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. Thanks. --E♴ (talk) 23:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Scorhill
Hello! Your submission of Scorhill at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Orlady (talk) 19:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * You're welcome! (By the way, I like your signature — it's very creative!)  Sophus Bie  (talk) 00:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks!--E♴ (talk) 00:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Scorhill
Thanks so much for nominating my article. I've added 3 or 4 more inline citations and broke it up to take it out of stub category I hope. Starting to look like a really nice page now. Cheers! Paul Bedson (talk) 02:46, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
DOh! Sorry! Sailsbystars (talk) 21:50, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Your Revert at Jason Brandonman
I see that you have reverted an edit to Jason Brandonman, which removed a speedy deletion template to the article, and added a notice to the user's talk page about removing speedy deletion templates from pages that he created himself. However, the user didn't create the page (IP's can't create pages), and the article was not eligible for deletion under G1 anyway. --Slon02 (talk) 22:05, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You're right. My mistake.  I'll remove the warning from the ip. --  E♴    (talk)  22:08, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Hey
Could you give a quick revisit to the Glee Volume 5 DYK? You gave it an approve, but the article for the episode using the songs (called, appropriately, "Original Song") has since been created and I have an ALT that could make the DYK a double hook. Curious on your opinion of that ALT, the last one provided. If it passes, I'd like it up on March 15 specifically as that is the episode air date and it's written for that date ("tonight's episode of Glee").

Cheers. =) CycloneGU (talk) 01:45, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you kindly for the revisit. I wonder if I would have the authority to create the special holding area further down the page and move it...it had never been done for March 8, probably because I had the ALT for March 15 in there at the time, but now that it's focusable specifically at that date it might be worthwhile to reserve it.  CycloneGU (talk) 02:30, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't see why not -- E♴    (talk)  04:35, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Excellent, I will be bold then. =) CycloneGU (talk) 04:39, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * And that's done. Also left a note on Yves' page (which Frickative, another Glee editor, will also see) asking to leave the construction tag off as you set it until at least after the DYK cycles through the main page.  Once it's cycled through, they may use that tag while updating the plot from the episode, as they usually do.  CycloneGU (talk) 04:45, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Good. Yeah, I don't think that there is supposed to be any tags like that while the article is at DYK. --  E♴    (talk)  05:00, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Oops, I never replied to that. Yves has been around since my post and Frickative has now seen it too, so I think we're all clear on keeping the tag off.  After the DYK goes through and the episode subsequently airs, the tag will probably return because at that point it will be in a major construction of the plot.  But for now, I agree, it just doesn't look good linking to a page "under construction" from the main page. =D  CycloneGU (talk) 20:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of William Isarn
Hello! Your submission of William Isarn at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Vandal at large
Hi there EAMON, VASCO from Portugal here,

regarding your message to this "user" (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tobymanchee&diff=416823441&oldid=416821324), just to let you know he vandalized that one as well. Why not block the "person" right away? Can nobody do it? These punks have no place being here at WP, my humble opinion...

Attentively, happy week - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 01:42, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Only Administrators can block users, and usually after four warnings. -- E♴    (talk)  02:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes i am well aware of that fact (the administrators stuff). But the warnings? This chap is clearly up to no good. Oh well, guess we'll have to go by the book... - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 02:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 14:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

United States v. Morris
Several days ago I asked if the article could be moved to the April Fool's Day queues for April 1. Is that okay? All articles from the past year are eligible so that's not a problem.  Royal broil  02:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me. -- E♴    (talk)  02:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Disi Water Conveyance Project
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   10:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar!

 * Haha don't mention it. Such are the perils of a recent changes patroller! Happy hunting. Bped1985 (talk) 00:54, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK for William Isarn
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   10:13, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism tonight
Woah... what just happened. Were you on about an hour to an 30 mins ago when Wikipedia turned into vandalism central? It seemed to be one of those group attacks. Bped1985 (talk) 05:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC) Bped1985 (talk) 05:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes- there does seem to be a lot. -- E♴  (talk)  05:42, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Scorhill
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   17:33, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome
thanks to nonesense edits by other editors, you have reached 7000 edits. Congratulations. 190.51.161.77 (talk) 01:01, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

P.S: haven't u thought about playing mmorpgs ?

The Signpost: 14 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:55, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
for hitting the vandals on my talk page. Thanks!  Wikipelli  Talk   01:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. -- E♴  (talk)  01:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Hello. I'm letting you know that User:71.203.85.14, a person who was in an edit war which you participated in has been given a 72 hour block. I think it may be a good idea for you to follow my explanation of the reverts on the users talk page as he/she does not seem to understand why his/her edits were reverted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aj00200 (talk • contribs) 00:56, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. -- E♴  (talk)  01:08, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Mauro Solar Riser
Materialscientist (talk) 08:02, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. That was unusually nasty for someone who changed "Party" to "Farty"... – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 03:14, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, no problem. -- E♴  (talk)  14:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Plochingen station
Hello! Your submission of Plochingen station at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Marrante (talk) 11:23, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of Ismailia
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   16:04, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Your Credo account application
FYI: I noticed that you accidently made a link to Here instead of User:E2eamon/awards (you did the pipelink backwards). I would change it but it might look funny editing someone else's sign-up because I also signed up. J04n(talk page) 18:29, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You're right. Usually I would catch that in the preview, but it made sense the way it was- I only would have caught it if I clicked the link.  Thanks for the heads up.  I went back and changed it. --  E♴  (talk)  22:41, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Dear Friend Hitler
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   08:04, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK
I've responded to your comment about my nomination of Follow Follow's DYK here. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 08:36, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I took another look and approved the article. --  E♴  (talk)  14:14, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Coldham Hall
Cheers, Big  Dom  08:03, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Zane Wright
Hello E2eamon. I am just letting you know that I deleted Zane Wright, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">&mdash; <big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee //  have a cup  // <font color="#4682b4">essay  // 18:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. Thanks. --  E♴  (talk)  18:18, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK for United States v. Morris
The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:41, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Panorama Welding
Hi, E2eamon. A few days ago, you voted at MfD to delete this page. Two users, myself included, subsequently reviewed it (and its talk page) and opined that there was information worth preserving. At first, I voted to keep the page and rename it, but through subsequent discussion, the nominator (Kleinzach) and I have come to an agreement that the information should be preserved through a merge into Picture tutorial. Given these developments, I'd appreciate it if you'd take a second look at the MfD and let us know what you think of the idea of merging this material. Thanks in advance, A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 17:42, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I left another comment at the discussion. --  E♴  (talk)  14:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Disi Water Conveyance Project
Good job! This is about all you get into return...in addition to the GA. Cash bonuses would be nice.--NortyNort (Holla) 13:09, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! -- E♴  (talk)  13:40, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikiprojects
Some days ago, you took part in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Conan O'Brien and suggested that we should have an essay named Not everything needs a WikiProject. I wrote some initial ideas, but feel free to expand it with your own perspectives on the topic. MBelgrano (talk) 19:09, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I added a bit to the essay. --  E♴  (talk)  22:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 April 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 09:30, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Please help me
Dear E2eamon, today I write article European Wildlife again. I corrected all errors there was last year. But all article was deleted. Nobody contact me, nobody describes anything. It is very strange situation for me. I've never seen anything like it. I feel as in Franz Kafka´s The Castle. Thank you for your help. Danny Worker — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danny Worker (talk • contribs) 10:24, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Danny- Because I am not an administrator, I cannot see the deleted article. Reading through your talk page though, I think that I have an idea why it was deleted.  It looks like the article still hasn't shown (reliably) why European Wildlife is important enough to be deleted.  Wikipedia doesn't include articles about everything- only important stuff.  The general rule is that if there has been newspaper articles about the subject, then it may be important enough to have a wikipedia article.  Most of the links you have provided were to blogs or other wikis.  These are not reliable sources because anyone can edit them.  It is possible that the organization is just not well enough known yet to have an article. --  E♴  (talk)  14:16, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Dear E2eamon,thank you for your answer. The main problem is, that there was warning, that my article is copying from http://wikibin.org/articles/european-wildlife.html. But it is mystake. Because from last year wikibin and other (wiki)sites assume the origin article from Wikipedia, then it was deleted. And now I can´t public my own (improved)article, because his copies from last year are on other sites. It is unbelievable for me. I think, that reliability is not problem now, I can supply other sources to my talk page. Thank you for help and for patience. Danny Worker (talk) 15:01, 13 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I asked the admin who deleted the article to recreate it as a userspace draft for you. From there, we can work to improve it. --  E♴  (talk)  22:44, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you VERY much for your help. Now is article published. I hope, that all is right. It looks, I could start work on my second article. :-) Thank you again. It was my nightmare. And many thanks for all whose help me. Danny Worker (talk) 08:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 April 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:51, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Graham Edmunds
I've replied to your comments at Template talk:Did you know, I'd be grateful if you could take another look. Thanks - Ba  se  me  nt  12  (T.C) 14:25, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I checked it out and approved it. Good work! --  E♴  (talk)  01:34, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Commercial Telegraphers Union of America
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Clement W. Payton
Hello! Your submission of Clement W. Payton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Sp in ni ng  Spark  19:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Also, the references are a mess with lots of bare urls. I can explain how to fix this if you don't know already.  Sp in ni ng  Spark  19:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

WPORE COTW 2.0 - the picture edition
Greetings one and all. For some of you, this will be your first time receiving one of these messages, as it has been a year since the WikiProject Oregon Collaboration of the Week (COTW) was a regular thing. My hope is it gets back to being a regular thing.

Usually I would go over the past COTW, but we are basically starting out anew. So, without further adieu, this edition is our semi-annual picture drive. We usually try to do it when there is decent weather in the state, and today seems to fit the bill. Now although you are encouraged to go out and take pictures, you can also just search the internet for images that have the proper licensing and upload those. Flickr is one site that has a fair amount of content with the proper licensing (most images on Flickr are not compatible). See WP:COPYRIGHT in general. For some “free” sources, check out the our dormant subproject that has some links to sources.

Lastly, if you need to know what images we need, here are the requests. Please remove the request from the talk page if you add an image.

Finally (this is not image related), as the years have passed, we have lost many good editors, and others, like myself, are no longer in school or are working full-time or both, and thus are less active in the project. The project lives on, but it has created a bit of a power vacuum without a de facto cabal still around all the time. With that in mind, I encourage newer project members to step-up and fill some leadership type roles. Granted, we have no formal ruling junta or anything and no real defined roles, but there are many maintenance type tasks that some of us just took on to keep the project going. For instance, I ran the COTW, was pretty much the only one doing assessments, updating the portal, and even handing out the awards. I am sure others in the project can name what things they have done. The point being, that while I enjoyed those and still do some of those, I simply no longer have the free time to do all of it at a level that the project deserves. That said, I hope to start a discussion at WT:ORE where we can see if some newer editors would like to step-up and take on some of these tasks, which will hopefully make for a more inclusive project, and maybe get us back to the heyday of say 2008 when things were really rocking for WikiProject Oregon.

As always, please click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 22:24, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Brian Bowman
Hello! Your submission of Brian Bowman at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:57, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Richard Waghorn
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Mooghaun
The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Clement W. Payton
Thanks from me and the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 18:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Brian Bowman
Thanks from me and the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 18:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 22:42, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Jay Houghton
Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Clement W. Payton
Hello! Your submission of Clement W. Payton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Sp in ni ng  Spark  10:10, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I have made a further comment at the DYK nomination. I am sorry you feel you need to withdraw, I am not sure that is really necessary.  Sp in ni ng  Spark  00:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:09, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 19:21, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Edit to logging page
Hi there. I just made an edit to the logging page that was rejected. I think it may have looked like I was deleting the paragraph on clearcutting, but I was simply moving it down underneath the heading "Logging Methods" instead of above it. I'm new to Wiki, so not sure if I'm permitted to try again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenbuilder11 (talk • contribs) 22:35, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * You're right- for some reason I thought that you had deleted that paragraph, but looking at the history, it is clear you were just moving it. Feel free to go back and change it.  However, if I'm not mistaken, it would be better if "clearcutting" was a subheading under "logging methods", instead of at the same level since clearcutting is a type of logging method.  Thus, write:


 * ==Logging Methods==

Clearcutting

 * instead of:


 * ==Logging Methods==

=Clearcutting==


 * (The difference is in the number of = symbols on "clearcutting".)Again, sorry about the confusion and thanks for letting me know. --  E♴  (talk)  23:10, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Declined G3 speedy deletion
Hi E2eamon. Regarding this, please be sure to check the page history before adding speedy tags. Thanks! Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 16:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow. My mistake.  Thanks for pointing that out to me. --  E♴  (talk)  16:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Ruaraidh gillies
I have changed the speedy tag on Ruaraidh gillies from db-vandalism to db-person due to the fact that it is not really being vandalism. Thanks, Baseball   Watcher  21:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok thanks. I would say that "everyone loves him he is so stunning" is pretty close to vandalism, though. -- E♴  (talk)  22:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Got it. :)
Between the original copyvio'd content and the comment on the talk page, it would appear that someone forgot how to spell...anyway, thanks for the tip. Best, PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:17, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Alexanderwolfe Wiki Page
Hi E2eamon This is with regard to your comment on deleting the Alexanderwolfe wiki page. I am Alex's manager and we created this page together taking information and photos only from his approved source. Could you please tell me why this page has been considered for deletion. I have added in some references today along with links to provide proof of him as a releasing recording artist, and not of questionable notability. Please could you let me know what you feel should be added to support this page not being deleted. Thanks. Bang Management Alexanderwolfe (talk) 10:31, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The problem, as discussed here, is that the page is overly promotional. As his manager, you clearly have a conflict of interest and if there will ever be an article on him, it should not be written by you.  --  E♴  (talk)  14:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:33, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

WTF
It was my OWN talk page, why can't I post what I want on it?????? StickMan won't stop pissing me off. NickelbackSucks1519 (talk) 01:18, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * What you wrote was a severe personal attack. That is not appropriate anywhere on wikipedia. --  E♴  (talk)  01:20, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Antwerp Diamond Heist
Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 June 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:42, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism Patrolling

 * Hey! Thanks! -- E♴  (talk)  03:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks -- The help page syntax was a bit confusing -- I assumed that I should replace the word "user" with my user-name. RandySteer (talk) 22:51, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion for Help
Suggestion to improve the help page for user sub-page creation: replace the word "Example" in the examples with "UserName". When I looked at the page, I thought that "User" was my user-name" and "Example" was the title of a page.

If the example read: "User:UserName/TestPage", it might be a little clearer. RandySteer (talk) 23:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I l forwarded your comment to Wikipedia talk:User pages, so someone who edits that page frequently can evaluate weather a change is needed. Thanks for the suggestion. --  E♴  (talk)  23:13, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Edits to Siobhan Magnus
I explained the reasons for my edits in the talk page. I never "vandalized" anything. Perhaps you should get a life, and quit messing around with other people's work. -Brian
 * It appears that you were not trying to vandalize, but you really should provide more justification for removing a huge chunk of the article. Your original explanation in the edit summary was only "removed uninteresting information".  After that, you gave no reasoning in your edit summaries other than "Undid revision 434622996 by Thecheesykid (talk)", for example.  I would suggest you stop trying to remove content until some other editors who frequently work on that article discuss the changes you would like to make on the talk page. --  E♴  (talk)  18:49, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 June 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 15:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Clarendon Tower
The DYK project (nominate) 18:05, 24 June 2011 (UTC)