User talk:E3/Online Discussion on Tunisian Wikipedia

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Csisc (talk • contribs) 13:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

General Guidelines

 * All the initial papers for discussion are in User Page
 * The Meeting starts at 12:30 GMT+1.
 * When the participant is online, he should write his full name or User Name on Participants' List
 * When 3 or more participants are present, the Discussion starts and all participants should be very sure they would not leave during the conversation process
 * While discussing, you must refresh this Discussion Page every 30 Seconds
 * The conversation is open even for Individuals not having Wikimedia Accounts

Participants' List

 * Houcemeddine Turki (Csisc)
 * E3

Conversation Process
But, let me first introduce the logo of Tunisian Wikipedia. I ask for your opinions about it.--Csisc (talk) 11:41, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 12:30 - Discussion began. First, I would like to thank E3 and GeekEmad for applying to me to give my opinion about Tunisian Arabic, STUNdard, Tunisian WikiCulture  and Tunisian Wikipedia. Since sTUNdard has been created, I had some critics about it as it was based on Amazigh Linguistics and on Ktbdarija only. That is why I invited to this online discussion to discuss the fact.


 * 12:52 - I am a bit surprised about the fact that no one participates and answers to the query. If there is no one to answer by 30 minutes, I will say what I have to say and close the discussion and wait for participants tomorrow at the same time. --Csisc (talk) 11:53, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Signing into the discussion. The logo looks good. We could attach the articles and use proper capitalization so it is written as "Elmawsougħa Elħorra". I do not see a problem because the STUNdard method takes into account the Amazigh linguistic elements in Tunisian, as a matter of fact it may be an advantage. E3 (talk) 12:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 3 February 2015 12:00


 * I agree on changing the spelling to "Elmawsougħa Elħorra". A new version of the Wikipedia logo will appear soon.--Csisc (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.229.251.66 (talk)

Final Overview

 * As the discussion was closed with only one participant, I will explain the purpose of this discussion so that it can be discussed by interested people. So, as I have said, sTUNdard 3.0 seeks of many weaknesses. So, I propose a new version here.

Furthermore, I think that sTUNdard Writing with these modifications is developed enough to have a logo. I propose this one.

All other facts could be explained only through discussion. So, I invite you to participate in a later discussion soon. You can apply for a date for doing this discussion here.

Yours Sincerely, --Csisc (talk) 13:11, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

E3 (talk) 12:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Agree on the Logo. I believe that the proper spelling of STUNdard uses a capital "S" in the beginning.
 * I am very happy that the STUNdard logo pleased you. So, I will adopt it for the writing of STUNdard Books and Guides as LTH had agreed the fact that I will contribute to STUNdard. --Csisc (talk) 16:14, 3 February 2015 (UTC)