User talk:E4Editor

Welcome!
Hello, E4Editor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TDL (talk) 01:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kyoto Protocol. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TDL (talk) 01:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Politicization of Wikipedia
This account was made for the purpose of providing a reasonable level of proof that the contents of Wikipedia are, on topics of a political nature, policed and sanitized with the aim of the promotion of a specific worldview.

The events that occurred are as follows:

1) I made a very small edit to correct misleading language and replace it with neutral language on an article about a historical (not current) event, in full accordance with the neutral language policy allegedly adhered to by Wikipedia.

2) In about the space of a day, this neutral language was replaced by highly politicized language - far more political in nature than the original misleading language that was corrected. In other words, the attempt to correct misleading language was the trigger for political sanitization of the article.

3) Reverts of the highly politicized language were all but immediately reversed.

4) This account was tagged with "edit war" status. The accounts which actually initiated the edit war activity were not so flagged.

5) And with further investigation, it turns out that the very account which initiated the edit war has the admin privileges.

BOTTOM LINE: NEVER TRUST ANYTHING REMOTELY POLITICAL THAT IS PUBLISHED ON WIKIPEDIA

Thank you for participating in my experiment. We may choose to notify you when the results are published.