User talk:E8QLx4L

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Prager (March 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laura Prager and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Laura Prager, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Laura_Prager Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gene93k&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Laura_Prager reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 02:54, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Recycling in Israel


The article Recycling in Israel has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTSTATS, this article is just a list of stats and regulations with no assertion of WP:NOTABILITY or any description of how recycling in Israel can be compared to any other country."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 16:42, 17 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: A different editor recommended closing this proposal and starting a different deletion procedure, which is the topic of the notice below. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 20:11, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Recycling in Israel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Recycling in Israel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Recycling in Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 20:06, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

WP:A/I/PIA
Hi,

Please read WP:A/I/PIA: any editor with less than  500 edits are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. That means you, and edits like you di to as-Samu. Please respect the rules, or you might get blocked, Huldra (talk) 22:40, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

This page is about as-Samu, not the the Arab-Israeli conflict. I improved the writing quality in a small section and added a citation. E8QLx4L (E8QLx4L) 17:30, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * You removed the link to Samu incident: if you think that isn't about the Arab-Israeli conflict, then think again. If you do that again I will report you, Huldra (talk) 20:38, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Huldra, I moved the Samu incident link into the paragraph.E8QLx4L (talk) 2:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * ....thereby making it much less visible. And you changed Jordanian rule to "Jordanian occupation", piping it to Jordanian annexation of the West Bank. If you think that isn't related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, then please think again, Huldra (talk) 21:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Alert
Huldra (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yedioth Ahronoth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Yedioth_Ahronoth check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Yedioth_Ahronoth?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Date formatting
Hello E8QLx4L. Could you stop changing the date format in references from day month year to month day, year (as you did e.g. here) – this goes against MOS:DATEVAR. Thanks, Number   5  7  18:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello again. I see you are continuing to change dates (e.g. here). Please could you stop doing this. Thanks Number   5  7  10:38, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, when adding new dates (e.g. here), please do it in the same format as the existing ones. Cheers, Number   5  7  11:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)