User talk:EATech

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, EATech. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page American Defense Systems, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Mr Xaero  ☎️ 00:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. Please just remove whatever items you think are spam or offensive. We have no conflict of interests and we are not trying to advertise. We were just trying to correct bad information being publicized. That’s all. i don’t see how your foundation can prefer to publish inaccurate info rather than just asking us to remove the link to our websites. Even when so many other stickers have links to website so. Neither have we made any marketing or advertising language in orb corrections. Bottom line is it doesn’t make sense for you to be publishing worng information and remove the correct information we provided.

Blocking us was also extreme and makes me wonder who is paying you to do that. Cause a simple email or message asking us to remove the offensive link would have been enough. But blocking now is AND republishing inaccurate information about our company is very suspicious.

Kindly address before real damage is done. Thanks.

October 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Bishonen &#124; talk 09:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

What?
You’ve made a big mistake by undoing all the corrections we have made to the article inn american defense systems. This is a publicly traded company and the information we corrected was for the public benefit. If there was any spam or links you didn’t approve of, you should have simply deleted those specific edits. But to repost outdated and incorrect information about the ownership, purpose, management and current status of the company is both illegal and unwise. You cannot be publishing and reposting inaccurate information about a publicly traded company on Wikipedia or any public media. It’s a crime. Please restore our corrections to your false information, and remove whatever items (like spam or website links) that you feel are inappropriate.

If you want; you can also unblock us, so we can continue to build the article properly. Or, if you like, keep us blocked and enjoy your day. EATech (talk) 20:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has no interest in any public benefit for your fellow shareholders or company customers. Wikipedia is here solely to summarize what independent sources state. I would also suggest that you review No legal threats. I've already explained how incorrect information can be corrected, but you need to want to be a general contributor here, and you need to have independent sources, which SEC filings are not. 331dot (talk) 20:35, 11 October 2019 (UTC)